From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nix Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] t5538: move http push tests out to t5542 Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:33:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8761kn86ci.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <87y4xk8asq.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20140530010649.GD28683@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140530013419.GE28683@sigill.intra.peff.net> <87lhtj8sqx.fsf_-_@spindle.srvr.nix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 30 20:33:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WqRcC-00034B-62 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 20:33:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932556AbaE3SdM (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 14:33:12 -0400 Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:54730 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932189AbaE3SdM (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 14:33:12 -0400 Received: from spindle.srvr.nix (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4UIX1iX009471; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:33:01 +0100 Emacs: because idle RAM is the Devil's playground. In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 10:26:02 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-INFN-TO-Metrics: spindle 1233; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 30 May 2014, Junio C. Hamano said: > Nix writes: > >> (signed off with my work email address for paranoia's sake.) > > As long as your employer is fine with your patch contributed to us, My employer encourages it. > and assuming that the patch was done on your employer's time, it That is hard to define, but I use this copy of git for work purposes as well as non-work purposes, so I arbitrarily define it as done on their time. > would be the right thing to do ;-). Just FYI, if your From: address > on your e-mail does not match that address, you can start your > message body with "From: Nick Alcock ", a > blank line and then the true body of your message. Yeah, I oscillated on that and picked the wrong option in the end. :)