From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Alexandre Julliard Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Shallow clone fixes Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:57:15 +0100 Message-ID: <8764d4vqno.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GncwZ-00065m-Qk for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:26:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934779AbWKXP0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:26:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934782AbWKXP0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:26:20 -0500 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:33258 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934779AbWKXP0T (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:26:19 -0500 Received: from adsl-84-226-49-216.adslplus.ch ([84.226.49.216] helo=wine.dyndns.org) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GncwU-00067L-NG for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:26:19 -0600 Received: by wine.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2130D10A151; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:57:16 +0100 (CET) To: git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org This series fixes a number of small problems in the shallow clone support in pu. After that it seems to work fairly well for me. The one remaining problem I see is that a git-fetch to deepen the tree doesn't take into account the commits that the client already has. For instance, on the Wine tree, a "git-clone --depth 1" downloads 4655 objects, and a "git-clone --depth 2" downloads 4660, so I'd expect that after the depth 1 clone a "git-fetch --depth 2" would only have to download 5 objects, but currently it downloads 4650 again. -- Alexandre Julliard