From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: BUG: 2.11-era rebase regression when @{upstream} is implicitly used
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:23:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ee2jyh3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
This is not a 2.21 release issue, and pre-dates the built-in rebase.
When you clone any repository, e.g. git.git, and add one commit on top
of the cloned branch, then run "git rebase" you'll get e.g.:
$ git rebase
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Applying: foo
Before 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog",
2016-10-12) you'd get:
$ git rebase
Current branch master is up to date.
The results are not the same for "git rebase @{u}" or "git rebase $(git
rev-parse @{u})":
$ git rev-parse HEAD; ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git rebase; git rev-parse HEAD; ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git rebase @{u}; git rev-parse HEAD; ~/g/git/git --exec-path=/home/avar/g/git rebase $(git rev-parse @{u}); git rev-parse HEAD
d0a1e49341cac6db3226eb0f76ec4a5912f18af8
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Applying: foo
3a9261d6e34d9f6d00c8e8411d7ddd8cffa02d97
Current branch master is up to date.
3a9261d6e34d9f6d00c8e8411d7ddd8cffa02d97
Current branch master is up to date.
3a9261d6e34d9f6d00c8e8411d7ddd8cffa02d97
With 4f21454b55^ checked-out the SHA-1 always stays the same, i.e. no
work is done for the same command:
69bd93d9aa438c6d903b8e62c3bf1c6c5ab8ec0b
Current branch master is up to date.
69bd93d9aa438c6d903b8e62c3bf1c6c5ab8ec0b
Current branch master is up to date.
69bd93d9aa438c6d903b8e62c3bf1c6c5ab8ec0b
Current branch master is up to date.
69bd93d9aa438c6d903b8e62c3bf1c6c5ab8ec0b
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 13:23 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2019-02-21 14:10 ` BUG: 2.11-era rebase regression when @{upstream} is implicitly used Jeff King
2019-02-21 14:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-21 15:10 ` Jeff King
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] rebase: fix 2.11.0-era --fork-point regression Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] rebase tests: test linear branch topology Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-22 14:53 ` Jeff King
2019-02-22 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase: don't rebase linear topology with --fork-point Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-22 15:08 ` Jeff King
2019-02-22 16:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-24 10:10 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ee2jyh3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).