Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Mark Kharitonov <mark.kharitonov@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can git tell me which uncommitted files clash with the incoming changes?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:49:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877eg80z1f.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217162108.GB914@sigill.intra.peff.net>


On Mon, Dec 17 2018, Jeff King wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:08:49AM -0500, Mark Kharitonov wrote:
>
>>     C:\Dayforce\test [master ↓2 +0 ~2 -0 !]> git pull
>>     error: Your local changes to the following files would be
>> overwritten by merge:
>>             2.txt
>>     Please commit your changes or stash them before you merge.
>>     Aborting
>>     Updating 2dc8bd0..ea343f8
>>     C:\Dayforce\test [master ↓2 +0 ~2 -0 !]>
>>
>> Does git have a command that can tell me which uncommitted files cause
>> the this error? I can see them displayed by git pull, but I really do
>> not want to parse git pull output.
>
> That message is generated by merge-recursive, I believe after it's
> figured out which files would need to be touched.
>
> I don't offhand know of a way to get that _exact_ answer from another
> plumbing command. But in practice it would probably be reasonable to ask
> for the diff between your current branch and what you plan to merge, and
> cross-reference that with the list of files with local changes.
>
> Something like:
>
>   git pull ;# this fails, but FETCH_HEAD is left over
>
>   git diff-tree -z --name-only HEAD FETCH_HEAD >one
>   git diff-index -z --name-only HEAD >two
>   comm -z -12 one two
>
> would work on Linux, but "comm -z" is not portable (and I suspect you
> may not have comm at all on Windows). You can probably find a way to
> show the common elements of the two lists using the scripting language
> of your choice.
>
> The answer that gives will be overly broad (e.g., in a case where our
> local branch had touched file "foo" but other side had not, we'd
> consider "foo" as a difference the two-point diff-tree, whereas a real
> 3-way merge would realize that we'd keep our version of "foo"). But it
> might be good enough for your purposes.

Isn't this done more simply with just running the merge with
git-merge-tree? Maybe I'm missing something. E.g. earlier I had a
conflict between a WIP series of mine in next in
parse-options-cb.c. Just using git-merge-tree and grepping for conflict
markers gives me what conflicted:

    $ git merge-tree origin/master unconditional-abbrev-2 origin/next|grep -E -e '^(merged|changed in both|  (base|our|their|result))' -e '^\+======='
    [...]
    merged
      result 100644 d70c6d9afb94c77c285fe8ee3237f7a40867157a packfile.h
      our    100644 6c4037605d0dfee59a084c440506f1af11708d63 packfile.h
    changed in both
      base   100644 8c9edce52f63bcb1085b119b3a2264a97b1fb374 parse-options-cb.c
      our    100644 1afc11a9901dba25dc0f6151e5d9a7654b6e3192 parse-options-cb.c
      their  100644 e2f3eaed072f77d63890ec814d810199f57248d5 parse-options-cb.c
    +=======
    [...]

Or more simply, you can "grep -q" for '^\+=======' to ask "does this
conflict?".

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-17 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-17 13:08 Can git tell me which uncommitted files clash with the incoming changes? Mark Kharitonov
2018-12-17 16:21 ` Jeff King
2018-12-17 18:49   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2018-12-17 19:35     ` Jeff King
2018-12-17 16:24 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-12-17 17:17   ` Elijah Newren
2018-12-17 19:37     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-12-17 22:50       ` Mark Kharitonov
2018-12-18 13:14         ` Jeff King
2018-12-18 15:51           ` Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877eg80z1f.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.kharitonov@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox