From: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] last-modified: fix bug caused by inproper initialized memory
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 12:47:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bjk9w5yv.fsf@iotcl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251128205514.GA605489@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I think this patch makes sense as the most obvious and immediate fix.
> But thinking on how we might have avoided this bug:
>
> - We have macros like ALLOC_ARRAY() and COPY_ARRAY() that
> automatically multiply the array length by the size of each element
> (by looking at the type of the array). We could in theory have a
> helper like:
>
> MEMSET_ARRAY(lm->scratch->words, 0x0, lm->scratch->word_alloc);
>
> that would have made this hard to get wrong. But that's actually a
> bit of a funny interface, because memset is inherently byte-oriented
> under the hood. So we are not setting each element to 0x0, but
> rather each byte. For a value of 0x0, that is the same thing. But if
> you chose, say "0x1", it is not.
>
> So it would probably have to be limited to something like:
>
> CLEAR_ARRAY(lm->scratch->words, lm->scratch->word_alloc);
>
> which I'd guess would cover most memset cases. But this is getting
> specific enough that maybe the macro is making things more confusing
> rather than less.
I've submitted a v2 that introduces MEMZERO_ARRAY(). I'm curious what
the responses on this proposal are?
--
Cheers,
Toon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-28 16:37 [PATCH] last-modified: fix bug caused by inproper initialized memory Toon Claes
2025-11-28 20:55 ` Jeff King
2025-11-28 22:20 ` Anders Kaseorg
2025-11-29 10:50 ` Jeff King
2025-12-08 11:47 ` Toon Claes [this message]
2025-12-08 20:15 ` Jeff King
2025-12-08 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-29 2:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-29 2:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-29 9:38 ` Toon Claes
2025-12-08 11:46 ` [PATCH v2] last-modified: fix use of uninitialized memory Toon Claes
2025-12-08 13:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-12-09 8:43 ` Toon Claes
2025-12-09 12:18 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bjk9w5yv.fsf@iotcl.com \
--to=toon@iotcl.com \
--cc=andersk@mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).