From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E771E5B94 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758036376; cv=none; b=FiWPOUr6b3C6QsO+r2ess1nmeN9/eyvc553wlclc+EQJ69/8FPKlcM/9+4zZSq8qq10W2M32o9ZfCMFpjA4cFvee4TFki3V7dTOteo/tJ6xZ4OeF4EDuYFyOu/C8jj2CtGTVkQiaYyL8Z/yVaEgKDxt++rIhJrRVDIJsnaiEvqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758036376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MARqj54ItlGq825QraiYAxkg+OsrddSsMKmaUX67wmY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k5RkHdmciosbDqRg0b0uwUeT08byzqqI8WhhKOh9XrUwmpA7bFjugRV/RLgu9TF7xd3fK2H5gB9OkNIwg7nrj7FgrKhbbmvpvRq5TdK8dASfK8wbswTFrIsvdtJnhSpa8VH4dKG2g8ISnMNCZNe+IouzbP+LD7atecOU1GHnCo0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=iotcl.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=iotcl.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iotcl.com header.i=@iotcl.com header.b=d+XJDPA7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=iotcl.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=iotcl.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iotcl.com header.i=@iotcl.com header.b="d+XJDPA7" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotcl.com; s=key1; t=1758036371; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dmRSa3RNhPdXYoNwFJeim/Dj+GUWU8s11h+HGaSAdZU=; b=d+XJDPA7k/l7Xhpn3uCMqRDpQYXFjXyShCjZgrzxwBVW5LxUuJDGitE38QetrG0UKxjgzZ MIGr704J09fpBeS1Vd8SebjV75W3Z8Hkwk0Wc63qGHNy4RZPbxq0xEjwo5QH558iMXUZmC QG58ESGWtUAom4Tr1QmW+zbzdUKhPaY= From: Toon Claes To: Junio C Hamano , Justin Tobler Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bundle-uri: ignore bundles without uri In-Reply-To: References: <20250912-b4-toon-bundle-uri-no-uri-v1-0-f4525a406df8@iotcl.com> <20250912-b4-toon-bundle-uri-no-uri-v1-1-f4525a406df8@iotcl.com> <5hm6qdyn5ifs2kr33nwuc67qa3vdgis6w26rlvicrdzznzazzt@uytayxq5r25n> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:25:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87bjnao1vd.fsf@iotcl.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Junio C Hamano writes: > I tend to agree. Instead of papering over a misconfiguration, it > would be better to let the users know, so they have a chance to > report and/or correct such a misconfiguration. So are you okay if I do `return error("some message")` instead of `return -1`, or do you expect more of a change? -- Cheers, Toon