* git rebase --interactive needn't call editor for noop
@ 2009-01-06 3:17 jidanni
2009-01-06 8:47 ` Thomas Rast
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jidanni @ 2009-01-06 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
On occasions when git rebase --interactive will invoke the editor with
the word "noop" in the buffer, it would be better if it just said that
on the command line instead of bothering to call the editor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: git rebase --interactive needn't call editor for noop
2009-01-06 3:17 git rebase --interactive needn't call editor for noop jidanni
@ 2009-01-06 8:47 ` Thomas Rast
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Rast @ 2009-01-06 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jidanni; +Cc: git
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]
jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> On occasions when git rebase --interactive will invoke the editor with
> the word "noop" in the buffer, it would be better if it just said that
> on the command line instead of bothering to call the editor.
The editor gives you a chance to wipe the entire todo file, aborting
the rebase.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-06 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-06 3:17 git rebase --interactive needn't call editor for noop jidanni
2009-01-06 8:47 ` Thomas Rast
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).