From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Thomas Rast" <trast@student.ethz.ch>,
"Carlos Martín Nieto" <cmn@elego.de>,
"Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literal
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:42:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d36uomlq.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120426085156.GB22819@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:51:57 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:19:23AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> I'd like to eventually stop building the documentation with
>> no-inline-literal. It was an asciidoc7 compatibility thing, but we can
>> probably drop that now. However, I suspect that would require us to
>> simultaneously convert all of the `{tilde}` uses back into `~`.
>
> I took a look at this. There were about 200 sites that needed to be
> fixed up. It was a pain, but it's now done. The resulting source is much
> nicer, and as a bonus, it revealed (and fixed!) a ton of existing
> formatting bugs.
Great!
> In asciidoc 7, backticks like `foo` produced a typographic
> effect, but did not otherwise affect the syntax. In asciidoc
> 8, backticks introduce an "inline literal" inside which markup
> is not interpreted. To keep compatibility with existing
> documents, asciidoc 8 has a "no-inline-literal" attribute to
> keep the old behavior. We enabled this so that the
> documentation could be built on either version.
The switch was actually at asciidoc 8.4.1, as explained in 71c020c
(Disable asciidoc 8.4.1+ semantics for `{plus}` and friends,
2009-07-25).
> ifndef ASCIIDOC7
> -ASCIIDOC_EXTRA += -a asciidoc7compatible -a no-inline-literal
> +ASCIIDOC_EXTRA += -a asciidoc7compatible
> endif
That of course raises the question what asciidoc7compatible means. I
have no idea, and google hasn't exactly been helpful. The only thing I
could find was
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/chunked/apa.html
It mostly seems to affect quoting rules. Do we really need it?
As for the actual patch, I only did some "lazy verification" using
git grep '`[^`]*[\\{]' Documentation/
That (unsurprisingly :-) turned up no mistakes on your part. However,
some markup mistakes show up in git-fast-import.txt:
diff --git i/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt w/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt
index 2620d28..3e8fbd1 100644
--- i/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt
+++ w/Documentation/git-fast-import.txt
@@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ The `committer` command indicates who made this commit, and when
they made it.
Here `<name>` is the person's display name (for example
-``Com M Itter'') and `<email>` is the person's email address
-(``cm@example.com''). `LT` and `GT` are the literal less-than (\x3c)
-and greater-than (\x3e) symbols. These are required to delimit
+`Com M Itter`) and `<email>` is the person's email address
+(`cm@example.com`). `LT` and `GT` are the literal less-than (`\x3c`)
+and greater-than (`\x3e`) symbols. These are required to delimit
the email address from the other fields in the line. Note that
`<name>` and `<email>` are free-form and may contain any sequence
of bytes, except `LT`, `GT` and `LF`. `<name>` is typically UTF-8 encoded.
On my box (asciidoc 8.4.5) the preimage renders as
`Com M Itter''
in fixed-width font. In the process of debugging this, I noticed that
the quoting rules are hilariously screwy. It seems that within a
paragraph, saying
``foo'' means `bar`
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
treats the underlined part as a `-quoted chunk of text, and renders it
appropriately using a fixed-width font. The trailing ` has no effect
unless it is followed by another ` within the same paragraph. But the `
right at the start of the "quoted" text has no effect either! Moreover,
this behaviour is the same regardless of the 'asciidoc7compatible'
setting. I wonder if it has since been fixed, but the above might be a
good idea anyway. (The quoting around \xAB is just for good measure.)
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-26 8:51 [PATCH] docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literal Jeff King
2012-04-26 9:03 ` Jeff King
2012-04-26 9:09 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-04-26 9:13 ` Jeff King
2012-04-26 9:42 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2012-04-26 9:50 ` Thomas Rast
2012-04-26 12:50 ` Jeff King
2012-04-26 13:09 ` Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d36uomlq.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch \
--to=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr \
--cc=cmn@elego.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).