From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] object-file: reprepare alternates when necessary
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 12:13:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecf011-415f-20d8-e781-18b97bfdca44@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAiv2I17+/IBF8pl@nand.local>
On 3/8/2023 10:55 AM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> The prepare_alt_odb() call only _adds_ to the linked odb list. It
>> will not remove any existing ODBs. Adding this reprepare_*() method
>> makes it such that we can use the union of the alternates available
>> across the lifetime of the process.
>
> Right, that matches my understanding. What I am asking is: since we only
> add ODBs to the list, what happens if we can no longer access an
> *existing* alternate at the time we call reprepare_alt_odb()?
>
> It's clear that that now-inaccessible alternate remains in our list of
> alternate ODBs, but do all object lookups hitting that ODB fail-over to
> the new ODB? I believe so, but it isn't totally clear to me.
It's the same as the pack-file list: if we fail to load something
from one, then we continue to the next one. If an alternate dir
is completely removed during the process, then looking for pack-
files again will fail to see any and continue without error.
This is already possible by deleting an alternate directory
while a Git process is running and might try to open files in it.
Git already recovers from this scenario.
If you're instead talking about the .git/objects/info/alternates
file being modified to remove an alternate from the list, then
Git's current behavior is to keep that alternate around for the
life of the process, and I recommend continuing that behavior.
There's nothing special that we are adding here that doesn't
already exist as protections when files are removed beneath the
Git process.
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 20:59 [PATCH] object-file: reprepare alternates when necessary Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-03-06 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-07 0:28 ` Taylor Blau
2023-03-07 14:52 ` Derrick Stolee
2023-03-07 17:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 15:55 ` Taylor Blau
2023-03-08 17:13 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2023-03-07 11:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-03-07 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-07 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 13:29 ` Derrick Stolee
2023-03-08 18:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-03-08 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 20:47 ` Taylor Blau
2023-03-09 7:24 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 9:06 ` Eric Wong
2023-03-10 21:29 ` Jonathan Tan
2023-03-11 0:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-11 3:09 ` Jonathan Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecf011-415f-20d8-e781-18b97bfdca44@github.com \
--to=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).