From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Subject: Re: reflog weirdness Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:44:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87fxxme8x9.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <87ve6iegny.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <7vhci2ectr.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <87prwqec4a.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <7vtzm2cwbw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 28 23:46:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J8Nyg-0001Fb-0h for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:46:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752539AbXL1WqZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:46:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752532AbXL1WqZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:46:25 -0500 Received: from ppp-88-39.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.39.88]:60979 "EHLO ambire.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483AbXL1WqY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:46:24 -0500 Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J8NwQ-0004x9-Tg; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:44:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7vtzm2cwbw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:01:55 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: () Junio C Hamano () Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:01:55 -0800 Was it a buggy "git commit" command, or a bad commit log message was fed to "git commit" by the user, and there is nothing for me to worry about? i'm sorry, even though it was only a couple days ago, the actual events are far back in my memory, so i can't say. i wouldn't worry about it -- probably user error. (i'm new w/ git. most of the time i drive it from w/in emacs, which is well behaved; it is when i leave that comparative safety to do some flailing from the command-line that things go weird.) i suppose one way to improve git would be to test how it handles interruption (control-c in the middle of a commit, for example). a bit tricky to arrange (reproducibly), though... now i go search the docs for how to replace that log message. thi