From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yasushi SHOJI Subject: Re: local clone much slower than remote clone Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:10:03 +0900 Message-ID: <87fyrlg9no.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com> References: <433DF862.4020500@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 01 06:11:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELYhb-0007NJ-4h for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:10:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750723AbVJAEKO (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:10:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750724AbVJAEKN (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:10:13 -0400 Received: from shop.atmark-techno.com ([210.191.215.173]:64712 "EHLO mail2.atmark-techno.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750723AbVJAEKM (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:10:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.local-network (dns1.atmark-techno.com [210.191.215.170]) by mail2.atmark-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEBF4442; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:10:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from wat.atmark-techno.com (unknown [192.168.10.81]) by smtp.local-network (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763CAB61F; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:11:31 +0900 (JST) To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <433DF862.4020500@pobox.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: At Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:45:54 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Downloading an entire kernel tree over cable modem is almost a minute > faster than a local clone! IMHO the local clone should just hardlink > the packs and objects, and be done with it. git clone -l perhaps? -s would be nice too. -- yashi