[PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[Yasushi SHOJI]

Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

RSS 2.0 Specification doesn't have <content:encoded>.
see http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss

I've tested this with Mozilla Thunderbird version 1.0.6 (20050802),
and seems to be working well.

Signed-off-by: Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com>
---

 gitweb.cgi |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

8a489f354a5412e44ddaf7443aaecb47a81167f8
diff --git a/gitweb.cgi b/gitweb.cgi
--- a/gitweb.cgi
+++ b/gitweb.cgi
@@ -1426,8 +1426,7 @@ sub git_rss {
 		      "</title>\n" .
 		      "<pubDate>$cd{'rfc2822'}</pubDate>\n" .
 		      "<link>" . escapeHTML("$my_url?p=$project;a=commit;h=$commit") . "</link>\n" .
-		      "<description>" . escapeHTML($co{'title'}) . "</description>\n" .
-		      "<content:encoded>" .
+		      "<description>" .
 		      "<![CDATA[\n";
 		my $comment = $co{'comment'};
 		foreach my $line (@$comment) {
@@ -1442,7 +1441,7 @@ sub git_rss {
 			print "$file<br/>\n";
 		}
 		print "]]>\n" .
-		      "</content:encoded>\n" .
+		      "</description>\n" .
 		      "</item>\n";
 	}
 	print "</channel></rss>";

Re: [PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[Sven Verdoolaege]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:30:41PM +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.
> 

Hmm.... in snownews this gets displayed as "Use  instead of .".
(http://www.liacs.nl/~sverdool/gitweb.cgi?p=gitweb.git;a=rss)

Is that a problem with snownews or with gitweb ?

skimo

Re: [PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[Yasushi SHOJI]

At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:36:07 +0200,
Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:30:41PM +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.
> > 
> 
> Hmm.... in snownews this gets displayed as "Use  instead of .".
> (http://www.liacs.nl/~sverdool/gitweb.cgi?p=gitweb.git;a=rss)
> 
> Is that a problem with snownews or with gitweb ?

we are not sure.  As Kay said, we need to find out _authoritative_
information for this.

regards,
--
        yashi

Re: [PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[Kay Sievers]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:30:41PM +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.
> 
> RSS 2.0 Specification doesn't have <content:encoded>.
> see http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss

See here:
  http://www.notestips.com/80256B3A007F2692/1/NAMO5P9UPQ

  The <description> element is designed to contain plain text ONLY. When
  the content of your items contains anything other than plain text i.e.
  HTML or XHTML the <content:encoded> element should be used.

Hmm, there was a request to change it to "encoded" and the mentioned page
sounded reasonable to me. I will happily change it to the "correct"
format, if you provide _authoritative_ information that we can trust.
"It works in XY-reader" does not count. :)

Thanks,
Kay

Re: [PATCH] gitweb - Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.

[Yasushi SHOJI]

At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:01:09 +0200,
Kay Sievers wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:30:41PM +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > Use <description> instead of <content:encoded>.
> > 
> > RSS 2.0 Specification doesn't have <content:encoded>.
> > see http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
> 
> See here:
>   http://www.notestips.com/80256B3A007F2692/1/NAMO5P9UPQ
> 
>   The <description> element is designed to contain plain text ONLY. When
>   the content of your items contains anything other than plain text i.e.
>   HTML or XHTML the <content:encoded> element should be used.
> 
> Hmm, there was a request to change it to "encoded" and the mentioned page
> sounded reasonable to me. I will happily change it to the "correct"
> format, if you provide _authoritative_ information that we can trust.

hmm... I'm not an rss guy.  so not sure for anything.

at least, the link you gave me points to the rss 2.0 spec site I put
in the log as "RSS v2.0".  that can be seen as "more trust'able"

also, in the rss 2.0 spec site, you can find 2.0 sample under "Sapmple
files", which contain _escaped tag_ in <description>.

that's all I can say :<  can any one help?

> "It works in XY-reader" does not count. :)

agreed.
--
         yashi