From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: Please review this pull request for maint branch with update of de.po Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:32:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipg75drv.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> References: <7vtxzr1kbd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Jiang Xin , Ralf Thielow , Thomas Rast , Jan =?utf-8?Q?Kr=C3=BCger?= , Christian Stimming , Git List To: Junio C Hamano , Pat Thoyts X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 08 09:32:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SReuN-0001wF-EY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 09:32:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752809Ab2EHHc1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 03:32:27 -0400 Received: from edge10.ethz.ch ([82.130.75.186]:41663 "EHLO edge10.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752421Ab2EHHc0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 03:32:26 -0400 Received: from CAS10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) by edge10.ethz.ch (82.130.75.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:32:24 +0200 Received: from thomas.inf.ethz.ch.ethz.ch (129.132.211.195) by cas10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:32:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7vtxzr1kbd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 19:24:38 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [129.132.211.195] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: [+cc Pat] Junio C Hamano writes: > - git-gui/ part of my tree is maintained without the rest of git.git/ > tree by Pat Thoyts, and an update needs to go through that tree. I > cannot take a change directly to that part. Doing so would make > it impossible to update git-gui/ project independently. > > Please redo your tree by having the originating author separate the > git-gui part out, make sure everybody on the l10n team is happy with the > result, and then throw me another pull request. Also arrange the git-gui > patch to go through Pat. I suspected something like this might happen, but proposed a simultaneous change anyway. My bad. Ralf, can you split it or should I resend? But for next time, can there be another solution? It seems that this process will make it very hard in general to keep the git-gui and core git translations in sync. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch