git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
To: Martin Nordholts <martin@chromecode.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git.el: Make it easy to add unmerged files
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:48:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iqg120ln.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9E0717.9040801@chromecode.com> (Martin Nordholts's message of "Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:48:07 +0200")

Martin Nordholts <martin@chromecode.com> writes:

> On 08/30/2009 05:58 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Martin Nordholts <martin@chromecode.com> writes:
>> 
>>> (Resending as I managed to mangle the previous patch despite trying not to...)
>>>
>>> It is nice and easy to git-add ignored and unknown files in a
>>> git-status buffer. Make it equally easy to add unmerged files which is
>>> a common use case.
>> 
>> That's not quite what adding a file means in git.el, unmerged files are
>> considered added already, and marking them resolved is done through the
>> git-resolve-file command. Of course that was implemented before git
>> overloaded the meaning of git-add to mean git-update-index, so maybe we
>> should follow the trend and use git-add-file for all index updates. In
>> that case git-resolve-file should probably be removed.
>
> Since git instructs the user to use git-add for marking unmerged files
> as resolved ("After resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths
> with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>' and commit the result.") and
> doesn't even mention git-update-index, I think we should change git.el
> accordingly.
>
> But why do we need to also remove and disable git-resolve-file from
> git.el? It doesn't hurt to keep that function and the keybinding, does
> it?

It doesn't hurt much, but having two keybindings for the same thing is a
bit wasteful since there aren't that many simple bindings available. If
we remove it, it opens the door to later reusing the 'R' key for
something else (a git-rename function would be the obvious choice).

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-02  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-30 14:55 [PATCH] git.el: Make it easy to add unmerged files Martin Nordholts
2009-08-30 15:58 ` Alexandre Julliard
2009-09-02  5:48   ` Martin Nordholts
2009-09-02  8:48     ` Alexandre Julliard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-30 14:35 Martin Nordholts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iqg120ln.fsf@wine.dyndns.org \
    --to=julliard@winehq.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=martin@chromecode.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).