From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Alexandre Julliard Subject: Re: unmark after committing with git.el Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:24:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87irgp85lw.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> References: <4576BB0B.9010200@xs4all.nl> <4576C0FB.8060000@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <4576C0FB.8060000@xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Wed\, 06 Dec 2006 14\:09\:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Grxhg-0001AI-DU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:24:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760647AbWLFOYk (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:24:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760646AbWLFOYk (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:24:40 -0500 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:58247 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760647AbWLFOYj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:24:39 -0500 Received: from adsl-89-217-133-170.adslplus.ch ([89.217.133.170] helo=wine.dyndns.org) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GrxhK-00024Q-Pv; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:24:36 -0600 Received: by wine.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D62F4F672; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:24:27 +0100 (CET) To: hanwen@xs4all.nl Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Jakub Narebski escreveu: >> But this break I think PCL-CVS behaviour compatibility. By the way, >> [Backspace] should unmark all files. > > it's M-DEL. > > Is complete PCL-CVS compatibility a target? As far as possible, yes. Note that you don't need to unmark the files to do the next commit, the files you just committed should be in the up-to-date state, and those are ignored when committing (and in most other operations too). -- Alexandre Julliard