From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sender4-op-o12.zoho.com (sender4-op-o12.zoho.com [136.143.188.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E6F3D522C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=136.143.188.12 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768499606; cv=pass; b=tTbI8FZtaczWqhT8QxzHf+C93Bu7wp0g1/Z3wiwaFD5H38517rfO7KZfDwaJZU+3zpSTPlW6o4fA/Tr6Y36pQpDEDlFItej6jtQc40tORcziQnAw7qyNVxdEEGJ54gBBKo42Yhy7a53I1XWekbQcJSzxUMVAKW/iSO5Oe248mzQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768499606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6QpxPJXFDEIl8TxExhFQHtT8p+Mcrr7H4N3Mb44I0iw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MHK0DPk6MT+BhTjkf4N3W+UTSgB0FJy6pTJ6gXQUcpr7z/0CV/vqejhjsUCXbEbN6qJLeelWT2srAb651cCfuQh4IIC7xmn2o8fTJFWEMRoLi9XBkJtrcdYiUTKtG7hXXI0alqKa2en23SVf9VZE/jlDGWD4Tn2F50hiGccJ468= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com header.b=Tao4OGqa; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=136.143.188.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com header.b="Tao4OGqa" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1768499590; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=XCQugZaZqxmHvilU+2ug+58QP7jDqJzXhblwkKJU+xrSKCwRD1lJ9sOKsZgNE+BkwoPe1KCLFR/jHovdO3H6jNbE0VE/a+az3Q2LdqpNqlYg4C0zv6Qszjkdfa8SzNIqzruX4BU0Xlw3flk8x7VzFD0xIHLaCfhTRCWhYZn5rMs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1768499590; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=KozKa1o6e2D9DsVDe44Pq1YR3o9NPo1F3S0jb+FAV8w=; b=gsvTNFqpI+FpRXzdtW5u73FKdG19Bm+hxYWqtJxRsZTPbG3AllTLOxWn1uHX90QdoelH4LjCGuGHmMMG/4JqCtmST3yd8kQb/CFKgUck0+HO7HK5Tc/JhYxQGtimnB8o3zwhhhX3gvfvmha7RB/so25gOAeuyRIA+9d7VAp08k4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1768499590; s=zohomail; d=collabora.com; i=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=KozKa1o6e2D9DsVDe44Pq1YR3o9NPo1F3S0jb+FAV8w=; b=Tao4OGqanAUomSh0zPCA/HjddDLd6HjhZ2oUsRwy+Zfat8q0lopzJGaISgqyuYo8 P2Z5nBv3Eu3f/cEYwlFVe2UPlc6iMKa847vhqAnfdhBpcUHyBiJhD5rJHQptSncJKFa L4mp7i7+ACeIQO3ig0wyQ9U1voIt7f732QnLGPLk= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1768499588405541.227984969964; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:53:08 -0800 (PST) From: Adrian Ratiu To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Emily Shaffer , Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Jeff King , Chris Darroch Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix two hook conversion regressions In-Reply-To: References: <20260113115633.230479-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> <20260114185731.2381550-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> <87o6mulrnq.fsf@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:53:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87ldhylq4e.fsf@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External On Thu, 15 Jan 2026, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Adrian Ratiu writes: > >> I agree with this. >> >> We can't let these two regressions enter a release, so we have two >> real chices: >> >> 1. Merge both fixes to 1.53 or >> 2. Revert the 'ar/run-command-hook' topic merge. > > Hmph, at this early point in the late release cycle before -rc1 > (yes, rc0 is scheduled for this morning, but that is not really a > release candidate that counts as anything), it is tempting to take > #2, actually. I just do not know how much damage such a revert > would cause to the tree. I'll experiment after I finish cutting the > -rc0 preview release. I do not expect any conflicts and, if there any, they should be trivial. Let me know if you need any help.