From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jari Aalto Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/fetch-options.txt: order options alphabetically Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:23:24 +0300 Message-ID: <87my3jzss3.fsf@jondo.cante.net> References: <87eiow1pey.fsf@jondo.cante.net> <7vpr8g32ht.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vhbts3285.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 22 11:23:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N0ttm-0006gv-3a for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:23:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754691AbZJVJXp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:23:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754528AbZJVJXp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:23:45 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52803 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754486AbZJVJXo (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:23:44 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N0tta-0006cR-Vp for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:23:46 +0200 Received: from a91-155-187-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.155.187.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:23:46 +0200 Received: from jari.aalto by a91-155-187-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:23:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-155-187-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YK269Y7vkEJIK1PAnF8MI7DwuPA= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I think you looked only at git-fetch.txt without > checking where else this file is included. Then the patch certainly is > understandable. It would probably make git-fetch.{1,html} easier to scan, > while making things not worse for git-pull.{1,html} Yes. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way to arrange all nicely, so perhaps you could accept the following patch to accompany with it. At least there would be ordered "git-fetch" and semi ordered "git-pull". Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/merge-options.txt: order options in alphabetical groups Jari