From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greened@obbligato.org Subject: Re: Rebased git-subtree changes Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:58 -0600 Message-ID: <87obfh4bzp.fsf@waller.obbligato.org> References: <1360064219-28789-1-git-send-email-greened@obbligato.org> <7vy5f2nyd7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 18 21:14:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7X6N-000051-U9 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:14:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757132Ab3BRUNv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:13:51 -0500 Received: from li209-253.members.linode.com ([173.255.199.253]:45213 "EHLO johnson.obbligato.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754881Ab3BRUNv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:13:51 -0500 Received: from c-75-73-20-8.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([75.73.20.8] helo=waller.obbligato.org) by johnson.obbligato.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U7X7q-0008Og-KL; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:15:47 -0600 In-Reply-To: <7vy5f2nyd7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:28 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Filter-Spam-Score: () X-Filter-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "johnson.obbligato.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Junio C Hamano writes: > This looks to be of mixed quality. The earlier ones look fairly > finished, while the later ones not so much. > > I am tempted to take up to 06/13 and advance them to 'next', without > the rest. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Baye Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > This looks to be of mixed quality. The earlier ones look fairly > finished, while the later ones not so much. > > I am tempted to take up to 06/13 and advance them to 'next', without > the rest. Can you let me know what you've taken up? I have a new set with some fixes. -David