From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [BUG ?] completion of stash name with git stash Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:14:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87obtzlfuv.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> References: <87lip3mzsz.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: To: Mathieu CLAVEL X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 19 19:14:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RnwVH-0006ma-Cs for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:14:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932734Ab2ASSOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:14:23 -0500 Received: from edge10.ethz.ch ([82.130.75.186]:31023 "EHLO edge10.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932685Ab2ASSOV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:14:21 -0500 Received: from CAS10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) by edge10.ethz.ch (82.130.75.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:14:16 +0100 Received: from thomas.inf.ethz.ch.ethz.ch (188.155.176.28) by cas10.d.ethz.ch (172.31.38.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:14:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Mathieu CLAVEL's message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [188.155.176.28] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mathieu CLAVEL writes: > Thomas Rast student.ethz.ch> writes: > >> This works for me using git completion as shipped with v1.7.9-rc2 and >> bash 4.2.10. Double-tabbing at 'git stash drop ' prints a list of >> stashes as expected. Which bash version are you using? > > > $ bash --version > GNU bash, version 3.1.0(1)-release (i686-pc-msys) > Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > It's the version ship with the last version of msysGit. > I'm not sure I can update bash on Windows without any risk to break something. > So, do you think it's coming from the bash version ? Indeed, I compiled bash 3.1 and with that (and otherwise the same bashrc etc.) I can reproduce. Ditto for 4.0-rc1, which was the newest version in the repository where I found the bash source[1], so I couldn't bisect. Perhaps if you can hunt down something newer you could try to find the version where it starts working. [1] git://gitorious.org/bash/bash.git -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch