From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Julliard Subject: Re: [PATCH] git.el: Use git-add-file for unmerged files, remove git-resolve-file Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87ocpk6qwe.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> References: <4AA026AC.10907@gmail.com> <7vtyzdrq1h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Nordholts , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 09 18:10:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MlPkY-0001OO-TK for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:10:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753682AbZIIQKA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:10:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753679AbZIIQKA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:10:00 -0400 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:40733 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753644AbZIIQJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:09:59 -0400 Received: from adsl-84-227-126-171.adslplus.ch ([84.227.126.171] helo=wine.dyndns.org) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlPk3-0005IM-W1; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:10:02 -0500 Received: by wine.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52EDC1E72A5; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:09:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <7vtyzdrq1h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:10:34 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I do not know all the details of how Emacs keybinding works, but I had an > impression that something-x sequence is triggered if you type something-X > and you do not have an explicit binding for something-X but you do have a > binding for something-x. > > IOW, if I only have > > (define-key global-map "\C-xc" 'compile) > > then both "\C-xc" and "\C-xC" runs "compile", but in addition to the > above if I also have > > (define-key global-map "\C-xC" 'grep-find) > > then I can invoke these two commands with lower- and upper- case 'c/C' > after control-x. > > If people have been relying on the historical behaviour that typing "R" > marked the path resolved (which may internally have been implemented with > whatever way), and if you are removing that binding, wouldn't that now > expose them to whatever happens to be bound to "r"? No, I don't claim to understand exactly how that works for the C-x case, but it doesn't apply here, "r" and "R" are two different bindings. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org