From: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, a.huemer@commend.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revamp git-cherry(1)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:02:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pppt31v9.fsf@thomasrast.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqli0h4kvj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:26:08 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> OPTIONS
>> -------
>> -v::
>> - Verbose.
>> + Verbose. Currently shows the commit subjects next to their
>> + SHA1.
>
> Whenever I see "Currently", it makes me wonder "why does it need to
> say that? Is there a plan to change it soon, and if so where is the
> plan described?".
I wanted to avoid documenting exactly what it does, so that in the
future it could do more than that. Is that overly paranoid?
>> +EXAMPLES
>> +--------
>> +
>> +git-cherry is frequently used in patch-based workflows (see
>> +linkgit:gitworkflows[7]) to determine if a series of patches has been
>> +applied by the upstream maintainer. In such a workflow you might
>> +create and send a topic branch like this (fill in appropriate
>> +arguments for `...`):
>
> I think the ASCII art commit graph that shows topology which we lost
> by this patch gave a more intiutive sense of what "a topic branch
> like this" looked like than an incomplete skeleton of a command
> sequence that would be understood by those who already know how to
> work with multiple branches. Perhaps we want both?
Hmm. I'll ponder for a moment and try to cook something up for v2. I
can't say exactly what, but after initially trying to keep it, something
felt wrong to me about the ascii art. Perhaps it's that it is only
vaguely related to the actual output format.
--
Thomas Rast
tr@thomasrast.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-21 11:30 [RFC PATCH] Revamp git-cherry(1) Thomas Rast
2013-11-21 11:54 ` Jeff King
2013-11-21 20:58 ` Thomas Rast
2013-11-21 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-21 21:02 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2013-11-21 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Rast
2013-11-22 19:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-22 19:37 ` Thomas Rast
2013-11-22 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pppt31v9.fsf@thomasrast.ch \
--to=tr@thomasrast.ch \
--cc=a.huemer@commend.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mst@kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).