From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jari Aalto Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-add.txt: Explain --patch option in layman terms Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:00:48 +0300 Organization: Private Message-ID: <87prad9d2n.fsf@jondo.cante.net> References: <87ocpxb46g.fsf@jondo.cante.net> <7vab1hdppb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 31 00:01:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhsSK-00081c-V4 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:01:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754156AbZH3WAw (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754154AbZH3WAv (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:00:51 -0400 Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.116]:41443 "EHLO emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754142AbZH3WAv (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:00:51 -0400 Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-10.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.94]) by emh06-2.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A080C7B9D; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:00:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.117]) by vs3-10.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.94]) with SMTP (gateway) id A02CC45722E; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:00:52 +0300 Received: from jondo.cante.net (a91-155-187-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.187.216]) by emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECA11C6385; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:00:48 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: <7vab1hdppb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:14:24 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Antivirus: VAMS Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: >> + operation to a subset of the working tree. See section >> + ``INTERACTIVE MODE'' for details. > > It is not justified with your commit log message, I do not see why you > have to shout in all CAPS, There are plenty of examples, that it's standard practise to refer top level headings, in all caps, from: POSIX/SusV guides for manual pages: "1.11 Utility Description Defaults" http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap01.html#tag_01_11 Jari