From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Define a structure for object IDs. Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 13:05:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4485vve.fsf@igel.home> References: <1399147942-165308-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <1399147942-165308-2-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <5365D91E.70207@alum.mit.edu> <536606AB.1020803@kdbg.org> <5366A09E.6030802@kdbg.org> <87ppjt6xjv.fsf@igel.home> <87lhugu7iw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87vbtk60lh.fsf@igel.home> <87d2fstuzw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Johannes Sixt , Michael Haggerty , "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 06 18:58:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Whhxs-0005Yp-3R for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 18:11:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753389AbaEELFN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 07:05:13 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:41501 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753323AbaEELFM (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 07:05:12 -0400 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3gMh6t2SG0z4KK7F; Mon, 5 May 2014 13:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3gMh6t1nBFzbbhm; Mon, 5 May 2014 13:05:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ipLEl0GRxYYj; Mon, 5 May 2014 13:05:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: KkKLtV+zwoKyIzbWmaPB7STlVEBJejvO2DniRClTE5M= Received: from igel.home (ppp-188-174-147-7.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.147.7]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 5 May 2014 13:05:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46CA42C05AB; Mon, 5 May 2014 13:05:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Can I have an IMPULSE ITEM instead? In-Reply-To: <87d2fstuzw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 05 May 2014 11:50:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Your premise is _not_ assumed in my statement. My premise was "a > pointer to something of the same type of [the struct's] first member". > That does quite explicitly _not_ state that an object of struct type is > in existence. So you are not taking about struct object_id, and it's irrelevant to this thread. This thread is about objects of type struct object_id, and their address is always the same as the address of its first member. Nothing else is relevant. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."