From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: emilyshaffer@google.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fetch: die on invalid --negotiation-tip hash
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 23:45:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sg0gzhys.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714193506.4084421-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
>> >> index 9191620e50..2c50465cff 100644
>> >> --- a/builtin/fetch.c
>> >> +++ b/builtin/fetch.c
>> >> @@ -1428,7 +1428,9 @@ static void add_negotiation_tips(struct git_transport_options *smart_options)
>> >> if (!has_glob_specials(s)) {
>> >> struct object_id oid;
>> >> if (get_oid(s, &oid))
>> >> - die("%s is not a valid object", s);
>> >> + die(_("%s is not a valid object"), s);
>> >> + if (!has_object(the_repository, &oid, 0))
>> >> + die(_("%s is not a valid object"), s);
>> > Any reason not to consolidate these, e.g. if (get_oid || !has_object)?
>> > Then we wouldn't dup the err string.
>>
>> Generally I'd agree, but aren't we explicitly conflating cases where
>> something is a valid way no name an object v.s. being certain that such
>> an object does not exist? I.e. this should be something like:
>>
>> if can't get_get():
>> error "couldn't get the OID of revision '%s'"
>> if can't look up fully-qualified OID:
>> error "the OID '%s' does not exist"
>>
>> Or something...
>
> Good point. I'll use wording similar to yours.
I stole the former from a quick grepping around:
builtin/bisect--helper.c: res = error(_("couldn't get the oid of the rev '%s'"), rev)
Then http-push.c suggests "perhaps you need to fetch" for
has_object_file(), but I don't know if it applies here...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 22:30 [PATCH 0/3] Push negotiation fixes Jonathan Tan
2021-06-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] send-pack: fix push.negotiate with remote helper Jonathan Tan
2021-07-13 22:23 ` Emily Shaffer
2021-07-14 19:25 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-07-13 23:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 19:32 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-07-14 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-06-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] send-pack: fix push nego. when remote has refs Jonathan Tan
2021-07-13 22:30 ` Emily Shaffer
2021-07-14 19:33 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-06-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] fetch: die on invalid --negotiation-tip hash Jonathan Tan
2021-07-13 22:36 ` Emily Shaffer
2021-07-13 23:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-14 19:35 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-07-14 21:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-07-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Push negotiation fixes Jonathan Tan
2021-07-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] send-pack: fix push.negotiate with remote helper Jonathan Tan
2021-07-27 7:56 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] send-pack: fix push nego. when remote has refs Jonathan Tan
2021-07-27 8:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-27 16:46 ` Jeff King
2021-07-27 21:11 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-07-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fetch: die on invalid --negotiation-tip hash Jonathan Tan
2021-07-15 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Push negotiation fixes Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sg0gzhys.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).