From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] Refactor to accept NUL in commit messages Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:16:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87sjmh4brz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1319277881-4128-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <7vobx863v3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vipng5k80.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vehy459bg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111023160744.GA22444@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v39ej5uqb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vy5wb3sto.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111024224558.GB10481@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 25 12:21:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIe8m-0004Ev-OR for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:21:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754282Ab1JYKVs convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:21:48 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:45011 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753298Ab1JYKVr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:21:47 -0400 Received: by faan17 with SMTP id n17so343905faa.19 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:21:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mgUDu5Bvtdo0wJjH4Xq4l6bQmVN5yuTAcCFO01CTocQ=; b=C+Q399bUr4qLvFa6PqoSNUqHnIwIjbE3MV4gSwijG+yABo4bZTAJ2NT8cykdCo7TUn dDYzU8BSMe7QckFikCjVSmja8acFuyQLSSDY1JtJGhie8h2fgPCdN81lAVgNW6/mBTgE 01Ls5KcAcXswIYnPcR/g38PxNXh4fti3k1Yf4= Received: by 10.223.76.201 with SMTP id d9mr50140266fak.12.1319538106443; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (176.119.broadband10.iol.cz. [90.177.119.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n25sm37551308fah.15.2011.10.25.03.21.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:21:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111024224558.GB10481@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:45:58 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:45:58 +0200 Jeff King wrote: > [1] English is my first language, so it's rare for me to even step > outside of ASCII, let alone latin1. But aren't there some languages i= n > which utf-16 is more efficient than utf-8? You sometimes hear something along the lines of the second "disadvantage" listed in the article below, i.e. "Characters U+0800 through U+FFFF use three bytes in UTF-8, but only two in UTF-16.": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8#Disadvantages_4 --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n