From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git branch -a now reports 'remotes/foo' rather than 'foo'?
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:16:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87skjcpeno.fsf@rimspace.net> (raw)
G'day. Debian recently released git 1.6.3 to unstable, so it has just
landed on my desk, and a change in the output of 'git branch' listings
is causing one of the front-ends I use to fail.
In previous versions, in a git-svn repository, I got this output to
'git branch -a':
,----[ git 1.6.2 and earlier ]
| ] git branch -a
| * master
| tags/16-1
| tags/18-1
| tags/19-2
| trunk
`----
Now, in 1.6.3, I see two different output formats:
,----[ git 1.6.3 ]
| ] git branch -a
| * master
| remotes/tags/16-1
| remotes/tags/18-1
| remotes/tags/19-2
| remotes/trunk
| ] git branch -r
| tags/16-1
| tags/18-1
| tags/19-2
| trunk
`----
The front-end I am using looks for a 'trunk' branch by name in the
output of 'git branch -a', which historically worked. Now, though, it
shows that fully qualified.
Looking at the release notes it looks like this was a deliberate change,
from this entry:
* "git-branch -r" shows HEAD symref that points at a remote branch in
interest of each tracked remote repository.
However, that isn't unambiguously clear about the change, and is pretty
light on the "why" parts. Worse, the only discussion I can find about
the change suggests that this was noticed, and there wasn't real clarity
about the background.
(See Jeff King under "[PATCH 1/2] add basic branch display tests" at [1]
for the details.)
I confess, to me, that having 'git branch -a' and 'git branch -r' emit
different values doesn't make much sense, but I suppose the upstream
code can be adapted.
I wanted to confirm that this was a deliberate change before I went to
the trouble or rewriting the front-end code however.
Regards,
Daniel
Footnotes:
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110564/focus=110616
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 2:16 Daniel Pittman [this message]
2009-05-11 5:26 ` git branch -a now reports 'remotes/foo' rather than 'foo'? Jay Soffian
2009-05-11 7:01 ` Daniel Pittman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87skjcpeno.fsf@rimspace.net \
--to=daniel@rimspace.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).