[PATCH v2 3/3] merge: small code readability improvement

["Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>]

From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>

After our loop through the selected strategies, we compare best_strategy
to wt_strategy.  This is fine, but the fact that the code setting
best_strategy sets it to use_strategies[i]->name requires a little bit
of extra checking to determine that at the time of setting, that's the
same as wt_strategy.  Just setting best_strategy to wt_strategy makes it
a little easier to verify what the loop is doing, at least for this
reader.

Further, use_strategies[i]->name is used in a number of places, where we
could just use wt_strategy.  The latter takes less time for this reader
to parse (one variable name instead of three), so just use wt_strategy
to make the code slightly faster for human readers to parse.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
 builtin/merge.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c
index abf0567b20f..5900b81729d 100644
--- a/builtin/merge.c
+++ b/builtin/merge.c
@@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ int cmd_merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 		 */
 		wt_strategy = use_strategies[i]->name;
 
-		ret = try_merge_strategy(use_strategies[i]->name,
+		ret = try_merge_strategy(wt_strategy,
 					 common, remoteheads,
 					 head_commit);
 		/*
@@ -1723,12 +1723,12 @@ int cmd_merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 				 * another.
 				 */
 				merge_was_ok = 1;
-				best_strategy = use_strategies[i]->name;
+				best_strategy = wt_strategy;
 				break;
 			}
 			cnt = (use_strategies_nr > 1) ? evaluate_result() : 0;
 			if (best_cnt <= 0 || cnt <= best_cnt) {
-				best_strategy = use_strategies[i]->name;
+				best_strategy = wt_strategy;
 				best_cnt = cnt;
 			}
 		}
-- 
gitgitgadget