git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: phillip.wood123@gmail.com
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, alan@norbauer.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] remote: allow `guess_remote_head()` to suppress advice
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:29:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <884dc4b3-d470-46f6-b129-c6d20817daf7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3rcpapodk473swxbdgubhuqijvgwe6rz5iqsfykglsmjbanuu7@mh6tvrhyyrx5>

Hi Justin

On 24/03/2025 15:21, Justin Tobler wrote:
> On 25/03/24 09:31AM, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> On 21/03/2025 23:16, Justin Tobler wrote:
>>> The `repo_default_branch_name()` invoked through `guess_remote_head()`
>>> is configured to always display the default branch advice message.
>>>
>>> Adapt `guess_remote_head()` to accept flags and convert the `all`
>>> parameter to a flag.
>>
>> This makes sense if we want to convert the boolean argument to a flags
>> argument. However the only callers that do not set `all` when calling this
>> function are in git clone where we don't want to emit the warning. It is
>> probably not worth a re-roll but I wonder if we really need to do this
>> conversion or if we should just hard code guess_remote_head() to be quiet
>> when it calls repo_default_branch_name()
> 
> Good point. We could just rely on the fact that all current
> `guess_remote_head()` callers that do not set `all` also do not want the
> advice to be printed.
> 
> I have a slight preference to keep this as-is and favor the explicit
> configuration, but ultimately I don't feel strongly either way. I am
> open to change in a followup version though. :)

I'm fine either way so lets keep it as-is if you want

Thanks

Phillip


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  9:53 bug: git shows hints that should be suppressed alan
2025-03-19  9:58 ` alan
2025-03-19 14:45 ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-20  1:36   ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-20  1:46     ` [PATCH 0/2] clone: suppress unexpected advice message during clone Justin Tobler
2025-03-20  1:46       ` [PATCH 1/2] remote: allow `guess_remote_head()` to suppress advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-20  5:13         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-20 23:30           ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-21  8:52           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-20  1:46       ` [PATCH 2/2] clone: suppress unexpected default branch advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-20  5:13         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-20 23:36           ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-20 11:10       ` [PATCH 0/2] clone: suppress unexpected advice message during clone Phillip Wood
2025-03-20 23:48         ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-21 16:42           ` Phillip Wood
2025-03-21 23:16       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Justin Tobler
2025-03-21 23:16         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] remote: allow `guess_remote_head()` to suppress advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-24  9:31           ` Phillip Wood
2025-03-24 15:21             ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-24 19:29               ` phillip.wood123 [this message]
2025-03-21 23:16         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] builtin/clone: suppress unexpected default branch advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-24  9:32           ` Phillip Wood
2025-03-24 15:35             ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-21 23:16         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] advice: allow disabling default branch name advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-24  9:32           ` Phillip Wood
2025-03-23 19:38         ` [PATCH v2 0/3] clone: suppress unexpected advice message during clone Junio C Hamano
2025-03-25  0:51         ` [PATCH v3 " Justin Tobler
2025-03-25  0:51           ` [PATCH v3 1/3] remote: allow `guess_remote_head()` to suppress advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-25  0:51           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] builtin/clone: suppress unexpected default branch advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-25  0:51           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] advice: allow disabling default branch name advice Justin Tobler
2025-03-25 14:35           ` [PATCH v3 0/3] clone: suppress unexpected advice message during clone Phillip Wood
2025-03-20  4:05     ` bug: git shows hints that should be suppressed alan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=884dc4b3-d470-46f6-b129-c6d20817daf7@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@norbauer.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).