git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: "robin.rosenberg@dewire.com" <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EGIT PATCH] Provide a more JavaBeans-style 'getName' accessor for the id Signed-off-by: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:53:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ACC6C83-75FD-477C-9083-96CA426FC069@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090810205907.GY1033@spearce.org>

On 10 Aug 2009, at 21:59, "Shawn O." <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:

> Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That patch was originally mailed on the 11th May. Has it taken  
>> until now
>> to notice the problem, or was the other method added in the last  
>> month or
>> so? If I'm to blame, I apologise but didn't note any compile time  
>> issues
>> at the time.
>
> Arrgh, you are right, I lost this patch in my inbox, and in the
> interm we applied new features to RevTag which added getName there. .
>
>>> ./org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevTag.java:206: getName() in
>>> org.spearce.jgit.revwalk.RevTag cannot override getName() in
>>> org.spearce.jgit.lib.AnyObjectId; overridden method is final
>
> I can't apply this patch because getName() on RevTag is already
> defined with a different meaning.  :-(

That sounds dangerous. We now have a .name() and a .getName() with  
different semantics. Can we not change the RevTag method name to  
something else so that we dont have an inconsistency?
>

Alex 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-12  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-09 22:57 [EGIT PATCH] Provide a more JavaBeans-style 'getName' accessor for the id Signed-off-by: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com> Alex Blewitt
2009-05-10 21:19 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-08-10 15:52 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-08-10 18:11   ` Alex Blewitt
2009-08-10 18:19   ` Alex Blewitt
2009-08-10 20:59     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-08-11 12:53       ` Alex Blewitt [this message]
2009-08-12 14:20         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-08-12 19:09           ` Robin Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ACC6C83-75FD-477C-9083-96CA426FC069@gmail.com \
    --to=alex.blewitt@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.rosenberg@dewire.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).