From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Santi_B=E9jar?=" Subject: Re: git bug? + question Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:27:36 +0100 Message-ID: <8aa486160611030227w4c79ace9ta00a3eecfc46b11a@mail.gmail.com> References: <7v4pthmew1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061103074857.GA15972@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <7v3b90gbfv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061103095905.GD7545@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" , "Miles Bader" , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MHuqyhVUBxQNVJkYA2O9/nLo+1osbvGj1BU25u/TVnOEjPMH4Y198cKXZFdTRcj/ni75Pci63X2NQh5vGl8bW787M8GiqVwy+NSJJDO3iQXIzSzJfDROkmQpaXh6RU9iPZZNX0mfJw8TuLyQ+G3U7xhua91dxOTT7/MEjBTTaUQ= In-Reply-To: <20061103095905.GD7545@admingilde.org> Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfwGy-0000tj-DF for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:27:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752907AbWKCK1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:27:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752908AbWKCK1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:27:37 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.236]:15752 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752902AbWKCK1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:27:37 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s14so374044wxc for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.131.20 with SMTP id e20mr2813570wxd.1162549656438; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.46.19 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:27:36 -0800 (PST) To: "Martin Waitz" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On 11/3/06, Martin Waitz wrote: > I think the most intuitive thing for pull would be to fetch into > remotes//* and then to merge > remotes//. Yes as the default branch to merge instead the first line, the problem is that it changes the current behaviour. But I think the most intuitive thing would be to record the branch it is based off at the branch creation time. Something similar to my patch: Oct 17 [PATCHv2] git-branch: Set branch properties Message-ID: <87y7rf80es.fsf@gmail.com> Note that it is for the "old" git-branch.sh.