git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Split fetch and merge logic
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:30:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa486160702161230r6f5825a2v861315c1aa52520e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd54950ed.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On 2/16/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > In the past we've had problems when we have changed the merge logic
> > (as shows 4363dfbe3). This patch makes the two process completely
> > independent, and concentrate the merge logic in one place (leaving
> > git-parse-remote.sh independent of the merge logic).
>
> But that is a solved problem, isn't it?  What else does it
> solve?  The justification for moving around the logic could be
> something like "these three patches do not do that themselves,
> but it opens a door for further work such as ...", but without
> something concrete in "..." part, your response makes the patch
> look mostly needless code churn.
>
> I was hoping to hear something like "now git-fetch has to do
> much less than before, eventual C-rewrite of the command, which
> can borrow some code already written for 'pu' branch, will
> become much easier" ;-).

This sounds like a good justification, also :-)

Santi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-16  8:06 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Split fetch and merge logic Santi Béjar
2007-02-16  8:09 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] git-fetch: " Santi Béjar
2007-02-19 20:44   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-19 22:13     ` Santi Béjar
2007-02-19 23:27       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-20 11:21         ` Santi Béjar
2007-02-16  8:10 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] t/t5515: fixes for the separate " Santi Béjar
2007-02-16  8:22 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Split " Junio C Hamano
2007-02-16  8:40   ` Santi Béjar
2007-02-16 20:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-16 20:30       ` Santi Béjar [this message]
2007-02-16 21:14         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-19  9:47           ` Santi Béjar
     [not found] ` <87zm7eo78x.fsf@gmail.com>
2007-02-16  8:23   ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] t/t5515-fetch-merge-logic.sh: Added tests for the merge login in git-fetch Santi Béjar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8aa486160702161230r6f5825a2v861315c1aa52520e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sbejar@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).