git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] git-what: explain what to do next
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:58:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa486160805270558v40e7faabh7d4426731693f917@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805271151430.30431@racer>

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Santi Béjar wrote:
>
>> In case you don't know the next step, if it is "git commit",
>> "git commit --amend", "git rebase --continue" or something else.
>
> We had a patch similar to this already, but I think that the right
> approach is _not_ to teach the single commands to explain their state, but
> to make a new script guessing the current state.

I think it belongs to each command to know the state, but I have no
problem with the single command approach.

>  AFAIR we have something
> like that in the completions already, as an (optional) prompt.

Thanks. And they do it a bit different, I'll use it if it is better than mine.

>
> However, I think it would make sense to push for that
> .dotest,.git/.dotest-merge -> .git/rebase change _before_ having anything
> like git-whazzup.sh.

That's a problem of the single command approach.

Santi

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-27 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-27  8:34 [RFC/PATCH] git-what: explain what to do next Santi Béjar
2008-05-27 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-05-27 12:58   ` Santi Béjar [this message]
2008-05-27 13:12     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-05-27 13:37       ` Santi Béjar
2008-05-27 13:52         ` Stephen R. van den Berg
2008-05-27 14:21           ` Santi Béjar
2008-05-27 18:08             ` Steven Walter
2008-05-27 20:24               ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-27 20:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-28  9:12         ` Santi Béjar
2008-05-29  4:39 ` Christian Couder
2008-05-29  5:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-29 14:56     ` Jon Loeliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8aa486160805270558v40e7faabh7d4426731693f917@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sbejar@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).