Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch.c: optimize --merged and --no-merged

["Lars Hjemli" <lh@elementstorage.no>]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Instead, we can let the revision machinery traverse the history as if we
> are running:
>
>    $ git rev-list --branches --not $commit
>
> by queueing the tips of branches we encounter as positive refs (this
> mimicks the "--branches" option in the above command line) and then
> appending the merge_filter_ref commit as a negative one, and finally
> calling prepare_revision_walk() to limit the list..

Nice.


> @@ -213,6 +211,7 @@ static int append_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flags,
>  {
>        struct ref_list *ref_list = (struct ref_list*)(cb_data);
>        struct ref_item *newitem;
> +       struct commit *commit;
>        int kind;
>        int len;
>        static struct commit_list branch;

I think you can drop the 'branch' here.


> @@ -239,12 +242,8 @@ static int append_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flags,
>                branch.item = lookup_commit_reference_gently(sha1, 1);
>                if (!branch.item)
>                        die("Unable to lookup tip of branch %s", refname);

..and here.


-               if (merge_filter == SHOW_NOT_MERGED &&
-                   has_commit(merge_filter_ref, &branch))
-                       return 0;
-               if (merge_filter == SHOW_MERGED &&
-                   !has_commit(merge_filter_ref, &branch))
-                       return 0;
+               add_pending_object(&ref_list->revs,
+                                  (struct object *)branch.item, refname);


..and use 'commit' instead of 'branch.item' here.


> @@ -305,7 +304,13 @@ static void print_ref_item(struct ref_item *item, int maxwidth, int verbose,
>  {
>        char c;
>        int color;
> -       struct commit *commit;
> +       struct commit *commit = item->commit;
> +
> +       if (merge_filter != NO_FILTER) {
> +               int is_merged = !!(item->commit->object.flags & UNINTERESTING);
> +               if (is_merged != (merge_filter == SHOW_MERGED))
> +                       return;
> +       }


A possible issue here is that `git branch -v --[no]-merged` might use
a wrong maxwidth, but I'm not sure if it's even worth fixing.

Thanks for cleaning up my mess.
--
larsh