From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Duncan Mak" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix vc git Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:17:55 -0500 Message-ID: <8e745ecf0612220717v5c7b3a02v55b36f865278ea9c@mail.gmail.com> References: <8e745ecf0612210325m72a569d7k370dd5953ccf6f27@mail.gmail.com> <8e745ecf0612210359j3f895521r1fff497a512253d3@mail.gmail.com> <7vhcvo92fx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <8e745ecf0612212011q26f81d91uce143b4212fc5e8b@mail.gmail.com> <87ejqsumu3.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> <8e745ecf0612220451v367479dq13af2d829a9547c2@mail.gmail.com> <87ac1guj9c.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 22 16:18:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gxm9o-0003eu-FN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:18:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945906AbWLVPR5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:17:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945908AbWLVPR5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:17:57 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.238]:41313 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945906AbWLVPR4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:17:56 -0500 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so33541wri for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr1274730hue.1166800675278; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.172.10 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) To: "Alexandre Julliard" In-Reply-To: <87ac1guj9c.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/22/06, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > OK, but in that case vc-git-registered needs to return failure, you > cannot call git-ls-files as it may find the file in the wrong > directory. I'd suggest something like this: > Ah, okay. I agree, that is a better patch. Would you be committing it soon? Thanks, Duncan.