From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>, "Windl, Ulrich" <u.windl@ukr.de>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-patch: roll over to next undecided hunk
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:41:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fdfb03a-6bbc-46a0-a8fe-9ad75aba555a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76665b6f-cb92-4694-bc89-5eb21197df34@web.de>
Hi René
On 03/10/2025 13:16, René Scharfe wrote:
> git add --patch presents diff hunks one after the other, asking whether
> to add them. If we mark some as undecided, e.g. with J, then it will
> start over after reaching the last hunk. It always starts over at the
> very first hunk, though, even if we already decided on it. Skip
> decided hunks when rolling over instead.
Nice
> @@ -1436,8 +1436,15 @@ static int patch_update_file(struct add_p_state *s,
> render_diff_header(s, file_diff, colored, &s->buf);
> fputs(s->buf.buf, stdout);
> for (;;) {
> - if (hunk_index >= file_diff->hunk_nr)
> + if (hunk_index >= file_diff->hunk_nr) {
> hunk_index = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < file_diff->hunk_nr; i++) {
> + if (file_diff->hunk[i].use == UNDECIDED_HUNK) {
> + hunk_index = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> hunk = file_diff->hunk_nr
> ? file_diff->hunk + hunk_index
If there were no undecided hunks then this will be out of bounds because
hunk_index >= file_diff->hunk_nr. Are we absolutely certain that we
cannot reach this point without at least one hunk being undecided?
> +test_expect_success 'roll over to next undecided (1)' '
> + test_write_lines a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q >file &&
> + git add file &&
> + test_write_lines X b c d e f g h X j k l m n o p X >file &&
> + test_write_lines J y y q | git add -p >actual &&
> + test_write_lines 1 2 3 1 >expect &&
> + sed -ne "s-/.*--" -e "s-^(--p" <actual >hunks &&
> + test_cmp expect hunks
> +'
I'm not sure what this first test adds, the one below checks that we
find the first undecided hunk which seems to be the important thing to
check.
Thanks
Phillip
> +test_expect_success 'roll over to next undecided (2)' '
> + test_write_lines a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q >file &&
> + git add file &&
> + test_write_lines X b c d e f g h X j k l m n o p X >file &&
> + test_write_lines y J y q | git add -p >actual &&
> + test_write_lines 1 2 3 2 >expect &&
> + sed -ne "s-/.*--" -e "s-^(--p" <actual >hunks &&
> + test_cmp expect hunks
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success 'set up base for -p color tests' '
> echo commit >file &&
> git commit -am "commit state" &&
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-03 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 9:23 Broken handling of "J" hunks for "add --interactive"? Windl, Ulrich
2025-10-03 12:16 ` [PATCH] add-patch: roll over to next undecided hunk René Scharfe
2025-10-03 13:41 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2025-10-03 14:10 ` René Scharfe
2025-10-08 13:47 ` Phillip Wood
2025-10-03 16:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-03 19:53 ` René Scharfe
2025-10-03 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-03 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-03 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-05 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " René Scharfe
2025-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] add-patch: improve help for options j, J, k, and K René Scharfe
2025-10-05 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-06 17:17 ` René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-31 10:08 ` [EXT] " Windl, Ulrich
2025-11-01 8:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 12:43 ` [EXT] " Windl, Ulrich
2025-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] add-patch: document that option J rolls over René Scharfe
2025-10-05 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] add-patch: let options y, n, j, and e roll over to next undecided René Scharfe
2025-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] add-patch: let options k and K roll over like j and J René Scharfe
2025-10-05 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-06 17:18 ` René Scharfe
2025-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] add-patch: reset "permitted" at loop start René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] add-patch: roll over to next undecided hunk René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] add-patch: improve help for options j, J, k, and K René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] add-patch: document that option J rolls over René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] add-patch: let options y, n, j, and e roll over to next undecided René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] add-patch: let options k and K roll over like j and J René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] add-patch: let options a and d roll over like y and n René Scharfe
2025-10-06 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] add-patch: reset "permitted" at loop start René Scharfe
2025-10-31 10:28 ` [EXT] " Windl, Ulrich
2025-10-31 15:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] add-patch: roll over to next undecided hunk Junio C Hamano
2025-10-06 20:05 ` René Scharfe
2025-10-06 22:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fdfb03a-6bbc-46a0-a8fe-9ad75aba555a@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=u.windl@ukr.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).