From: Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com>
To: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, drizzd@aon.at,
gitster@pobox.com, spearce@spearce.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/lib-http.sh: Restructure finding of default httpd location
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:30:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <905315640911191930rc33cabdr290b534ffbe85690@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76718490911191914n23d067b8teb17907de9ec83d5@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Tarmigan Casebolt
> <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> wrote:
>> uname might not be the best way to determine the default location for
>> httpd since different Linux distributions apparently put httpd in
>> different places, so we test a couple different locations for httpd,
>> and use the first one that we come across. We do the same for the
>> modules directory.
>
> Perhaps testing the distribution and looking in the known location for
> that distribution then? That said, going through a list of well known
> locations should work too.
Is there a nice way to test the distribution? Seems to me like doing
that might be more complicated and also more fragile.
>> +for DEFAULT_HTTPD_PATH in '/usr/sbin/httpd' '/usr/sbin/apache2'
>> +do
>> + test -x "$DEFAULT_HTTPD_PATH" && break
>> +done
>
> Unfortunately this leaves DEFAULT_HTTPD_PATH as the last item in the
> list even if the test does not pass. You can add an empty item to the
> end of the list if you want to do this way.
Yes. I think this is how it was before though too, and it is caught
later in the script with the LIB_HTTPD_PATH setting and testing.
>> +for DEFAULT_HTTPD_MODULE_PATH in '/usr/libexec/apache2' \
>> + '/usr/lib/apache2/modules' \
>> + '/usr/lib64/httpd/modules' \
>> + '/usr/lib/httpd/modules'
>> +do
>> + test -d "$DEFAULT_HTTPD_MODULE_PATH" && break
>> +done
>
> Ditto.
Yes. Again, this is still more thorough than before, but in this case
the script does not check later. Perhaps the script should test this
value and test_done if it's not a directory?
Thanks,
Tarmigan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-20 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-20 1:22 [PATCH 1/2] t/lib-http.sh: Restructure finding of default httpd location Tarmigan Casebolt
2009-11-20 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] t/lib-http.sh: Enable httpd tests by default Tarmigan Casebolt
2009-11-20 8:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-20 19:03 ` Tarmigan
2009-11-20 20:11 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-11-20 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-20 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-20 3:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/lib-http.sh: Restructure finding of default httpd location Jay Soffian
2009-11-20 3:30 ` Tarmigan [this message]
2010-01-02 22:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Tarmigan Casebolt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=905315640911191930rc33cabdr290b534ffbe85690@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tarmigan+git@gmail.com \
--cc=drizzd@aon.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).