Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Smart-http tests: Break test t5560-http-backend into pieces

[Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Tarmigan <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> One reason it's labeled RFC is that I'm not very confident in my
>> ability to write portable shell script.  It works for me with bash,
>> but I'm not completely confident that is would work on ksh or dash.
>> So it would be nice if you could specifically take a look at the new
>> POST() and GET() and see if you notice anything obviously wrong there.
>
> Looked Ok to me from a cursory reading, even though I wonder what the
> first argument to run_backend function is good for...

Thanks for looking.  I used the run_backend that was introduced in
34b6cb8bb, but looking more closely, it seems that the "http-backend
blocks bad PATH_INFO" test wasn't actually checking anything.  It
seems the path_info function was intended to be used, but never
actually was.  I'm embarrassed to say that I was so focused on "no
changes to existing tests" that I wasn't thinking about the bigger
picture.

I have made a patch to address this, and have made it the first in the
series.  I would like to have Shawn's ack on at least that first
patch, as I was trying to guess at his original intention with that
test.

Thanks,
Tarmigan