From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F025265614 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 20:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760042846; cv=none; b=UajcsO5iEDdvc/33/JdIsENWkS/CiDj1E/fAezLkOQUxBaYBk+8nAA4lwAnPnjtPYfeaF+QjzcNgXpuZcYiMLA15sGuTNVhF3sy0Tv13yAAvhvJXa2YHgs4lDk5VpmG24MGA2ttRNCuF85bQ2f8uXUtoc8HRSH25xCc4jSfUnOg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760042846; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p+dn/OMmDYb328VlH7HNbmf7Rrw9EXfyR9Oh4bfbaXI=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=EGruX/AZiOAAMeJ4X9y1LH4o5Sy11yLXz9654nedou2u9ppEWqn55kIaEskaJB7pX0+UndlZDyxbRq/3njgz9oxCFh14aA5N3yjGl1fiV6wmnhhscEup3SIZfa6rAFlIdLZ8LO7ijL/OykpAfR3ShHYLPgeN/xXxL6EbBNZFAb4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b=G0fmydoP; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=XwO1iLd/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=khaugsbakk.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=khaugsbakk.name header.i=@khaugsbakk.name header.b="G0fmydoP"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="XwO1iLd/" Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7FD14000D6; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:47:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-07 ([10.202.2.97]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Oct 2025 16:47:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khaugsbakk.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760042843; x=1760129243; bh=p+dn/OMmDYb328VlH7HNbmf7Rrw9EXfy R9Oh4bfbaXI=; b=G0fmydoPozG67eKd76jWrOG4ANCoGyLfeF9l6VMFp2kFa34R G1McJJKTHjBQUFBUo0UGbt23tytPCBEKhfPsFOMMOkVKGkWuF6zi5/XMBZL1c9A6 ZmmpqGcjIR/Bko13QQA5+xjoqI/TGgD4qecYTw8jllEY9ph93XvQjMXDweu1XRpM /BHtAixNNbgk2YiCmdrdyUrKh/y0pUXDsVgs8YQKkUMom0A8rFYFd3zCyKJFAigJ KU+VWQCLi9HHmojXCR4sTA/8mJzsou4OwsAd1UubnNIFitBLsUb6EXBy49Lqj+6B qgGsFVf9ST1me9/ueTQIQucqfscJeNtILzFwWA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1760042843; x= 1760129243; bh=p+dn/OMmDYb328VlH7HNbmf7Rrw9EXfyR9Oh4bfbaXI=; b=X wO1iLd/XxLQoqbmdfSqRxyoj3sF/whap/C5gm9wuzF3h4XHwnvZDbYK/7Le5Foy+ H2CLoCd1PqVdFb+qc+d18XqvaffRx1UhCfcUR+uNiAUJEdAEQVZUILZ/ISna/Q7m J62KOwNJF+7uZ1AGpseN0ie3naXWQrEjaaTDDJOI6ePf4BXR6LaN9x1PmFFF+4p/ UO9uNVx8+4tntBs1XGTFJhL2C94oWSPtc05a6u2zX15YU+kUU3lbD0NnCjLnCoLd vbX2wluvjY0lZM4OR9H0tWbUNZ17BqPuXuRTAYjFqw1vLc8RME9oO9TRswFygFdB AaB009KD/hJtnIlN3tz3A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddutdejudejucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfmfhrihhs thhofhhfvghrucfjrghughhssggrkhhkfdcuoegtohguvgeskhhhrghughhssggrkhhkrd hnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeetgefhgeefveelgeduvdekteehieevffdu jeelgfduffffjeelffffledukeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptghouggvsehkhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggp rhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhilhhlih hprdifohhougesughunhgvlhhmrdhorhhgrdhukhdprhgtphhtthhopehkrhhishhtohhf fhgvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjie htsehkuggsghdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdho rhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2671468f:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D73B11EA0062; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:47:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: And9clSpnOi7 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 22:47:00 +0200 From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" , "Phillip Wood" , "Johannes Sixt" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <91ddb8c2-ae3a-4b13-a23b-e5cca172ee09@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <6af09726-e3bf-4903-87ae-9524ad334678@kdbg.org> <3a8dfd13-982d-4c83-b675-1e9a63bb6ab0@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: warn against --committer-date-is-author-date Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 9, 2025, at 16:31, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: >> We should maybe think about deprecating it for "git rebase" though as= it >> is a lot less clear that it is sensible there. If you're rebasing a >> branch then there is a very high likely hood that the upstream commit= ter >> dates of the commits the branch is being rebased onto will be newer t= hat >> the author dates of the commits in your branch. > > That makes sense. If there is no use case then it should be deprecated. > > I could mark it as such in the next version. > > Anyone else have an opinion on this? > By the way. I thought of adding a stderr warning when using this option on git-rebase(1). But I don=E2=80=99t think I=E2=80=99ve seen that used = in this program before. If so, why is that? That=E2=80=99s more in your face than just a= dding it to the documentation. Is it about people parsing stderr, maybe..?