git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Rast" <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Wielemaker" <J.Wielemaker@uva.nl>
Subject: Re: [TOY PATCH] filter-branch: add option --delete-unchanged
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:29:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94a0d4530809140929s1728a7aevb9f4b0a0469eba0c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218226224-25273-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch>

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
> With --delete-unchanged, we nuke refs whose targets did not change
> during rewriting.  It is intended to be used along with
> --subdirectory-filter to clean out old refs from before the first
> commit to the filtered subdirectory.  (They would otherwise keep the
> old history alive.)
>
> Obviously this is a rather dangerous mode of operation.
>
> Note the "sort -u" is required: Without it, --all includes
> 'origin/master' twice (from 'origin/master' and via 'origin/HEAD'),
> and the second pass concludes it is unchanged and nukes the ref.

This is really useful, why isn't it merged?

Personally I use filter-branch to, duh, filter a branch, so I don't
want the commit objects that are not filtered, nor the refs to them.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-14 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-06 13:39 git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter, still a mistery Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-07  7:13 ` Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-07  7:50 ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-07 10:14   ` Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-07 23:48     ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-07 23:50       ` [PATCH] filter-branch: be more helpful when an annotated tag changes Thomas Rast
2008-08-08 20:10         ` [TOY PATCH] filter-branch: add option --delete-unchanged Thomas Rast
2008-08-09  0:35           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-11 10:43           ` Jan Wielemaker
2008-09-14 16:29           ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2008-08-07 23:54       ` [RFH] filter-branch: ancestor detection weirdness Thomas Rast
2008-08-08 11:42         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-08 14:14           ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-08 14:16             ` [PATCH] filter-branch: fix ancestor discovery for --subdirectory-filter Thomas Rast
2008-08-08 14:39             ` [RFH] filter-branch: ancestor detection weirdness Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-08 18:37               ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-08 18:39                 ` [PATCH v2] filter-branch: fix ref rewriting with --subdirectory-filter Thomas Rast
2008-08-09  0:16                 ` [RFH] filter-branch: ancestor detection weirdness Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-09  1:25                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-09  9:25                     ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-09  9:35                       ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-10 14:02                     ` [PATCH] filter-branch: use --simplify-merges Thomas Rast
2008-08-12  1:54                       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-12  2:13                         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-12  5:47                           ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-12  6:59                             ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-12  8:45                               ` [PATCH 0/3] filter-branch --subdirectory-filter improvements Thomas Rast
2008-08-12 12:11                                 ` Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-12  8:45                               ` [PATCH 1/3] filter-branch: Extend test to show rewriting bug Thomas Rast
2008-08-12  8:45                               ` [PATCH 2/3] filter-branch: fix ref rewriting with --subdirectory-filter Thomas Rast
2008-08-12  8:45                               ` [PATCH 3/3] filter-branch: use --simplify-merges Thomas Rast
2008-08-12  8:18                     ` [RFH] filter-branch: ancestor detection weirdness Petr Baudis
2008-08-12 18:33                       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-09 10:00                   ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-12 21:33                     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-12 22:15                       ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-08  7:44       ` git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter, still a mistery Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-08 11:25       ` Jan Wielemaker
2008-08-07 14:04   ` [PATCH] Documentation: filter-branch: document how to filter all refs Thomas Rast
2008-08-07 14:16     ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Rast

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94a0d4530809140929s1728a7aevb9f4b0a0469eba0c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=J.Wielemaker@uva.nl \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).