git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - second trial run, and question  about announcing it
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:31:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94a0d4530907060531n264d416u615f6924969dd277@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A51B25C.9040904@op5.se>

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Ericsson<ae@op5.se> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jakub Narebski<jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's just that somehow for "Git Development Community" a mailing list
>>> is enough.  We don't have official git blog, we don't have bugtracker
>>> (issue tracker).  At the beginning git didn't even had _homepage_.
>>
>> How do you know that? Have you already asked that question in a survey
>> already? ;)
>>
>
> The git developer community flourishes without official blogs, and it
> did so even before we had a webpage. In truth, I visit the mailing
> list archives more often than I visit the webpage. It doesn't *need* a
> blog (or a forum, or a tracker, or whatever), but some people might
> find such things helpful. Personally, I'm a huge fan of having it all
> in one place.

I'm not saying a blog is needed for git to flourish.

I'm saying a blog would help to send official messages.

>> As an experiment I added http://gitrss.q42.co.uk/announce.rss to my
>> Google Reader, and through some tricks you can actually see how many
>> people are subscribed to that feed: 26. For reference
>> gitlog.wordpress.com has 28, and Planet IM, a relatively unknown
>> planet: 844.
>>
>> And I have many friends who don't follow git's mailing list, so no, I
>> don't think a mailing list is enough for official announcements.
>>
>
> There are no forums suitable for everyone who are interested in git
> development. We can (sort of) rely on package maintainers for the
> various distros to keep track of groundbreaking changes. People who
> compile from source are sort of on their own if they don't want to
> follow the mailing list or in some other way find out what's going
> on. I don't have a problem with that, and it matches what I'd have
> expected myself if I was building something from source.

I'm not talking about people that compile git, I'm talking about the
bulk of the users; the ones who use package management to install git
and most of the time don't even know which version they are running
nor what new features are available.

In any case, you think there's no need for a blog, I think there is,
how about the rest of the users? Isn't that a question suitable for
asking in the survey?

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-06 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-02 23:30 [RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - second trial run, and question about announcing it Jakub Narebski
2009-07-03  0:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-03 22:23   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-03 23:19 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-04  1:26   ` David Aguilar
2009-07-04  8:24     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-04 22:43       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-04 23:46         ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-04 22:40   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-04 23:53     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-05 17:53       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-05 18:30       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-05 19:15         ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-05 19:45           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-05 20:12             ` Felipe Contreras
2009-07-06  8:14               ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-07-06 11:16                 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-07-06 12:31                 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2009-07-06 13:14                   ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-07-06 21:49             ` Elijah Newren
2009-07-04  9:05 ` Martin Renold
2009-07-06 21:44   ` Jakub Narebski
     [not found] ` <40aa078e0907071716k40d6ce9cwc0f9801f4042ef3a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-07-08  1:02   ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94a0d4530907060531n264d416u615f6924969dd277@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).