From: "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] branch: description for orphan branch errors
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 01:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a050344-27ea-4f26-e66a-2795596eb11d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8rifp63p.fsf@gitster.g>
On 7/1/23 0:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thinking of this as a whole, perhaps after this series we can add:
>
> Why "after"? If we already know that the existing patches are
> making things worse and need to fix the regression with a future
> patch to make it usable again, why introduce a regression in the
> first place?
>
I'm not sure if it is so worse, and if the optimization is a fix.
We're actually paying for worktrees twice in:
reject_rebase_or_bisedt_branch() and
replace_each_worktree_head_symref().
Making the change this way makes more obvious IMHO what we are moving
and why.
Start moving the ref_exists() in 1/2, easily leads to 2/1 and this patch
squashed with 1/2, for little gain (IMHO) and worse history.
This is why I think it's a good sequence. But I understand your point
and I'm not opposed to doing it as you suggest if you think the current
way doesn't pay off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-07 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-30 22:59 [PATCH 0/2] branch: operations on orphan branches Rubén Justo
2022-12-30 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] branch: description for orphan branch errors Rubén Justo
2023-01-01 3:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-03 1:15 ` Rubén Justo
2023-01-04 6:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-06 23:39 ` Rubén Justo
2023-01-06 23:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-07 0:35 ` Rubén Justo [this message]
2023-01-07 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-30 23:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree Rubén Justo
2023-01-15 23:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] branch: operations on orphan branches Rubén Justo
2023-01-16 0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] avoid unnecessary worktrees traversing Rubén Justo
2023-01-19 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-19 23:26 ` Rubén Justo
2023-01-16 0:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] branch: description for orphan branch errors Rubén Justo
2023-01-16 0:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree Rubén Justo
2023-01-19 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-19 23:34 ` Rubén Justo
2023-01-16 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 " Rubén Justo
2023-02-06 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] branch: operations on orphan branches Rubén Justo
2023-02-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals Rubén Justo
2023-02-11 4:16 ` Jonathan Tan
2023-02-15 22:00 ` Rubén Justo
2023-02-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] branch: description for orphan branch errors Rubén Justo
2023-02-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree Rubén Justo
2023-02-07 0:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] branch: operations on orphan branches Junio C Hamano
2023-02-07 8:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-08 0:35 ` Rubén Justo
2023-02-08 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-22 22:50 ` [PATCH v4 " Rubén Justo
2023-02-22 22:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals Rubén Justo
2023-02-25 15:08 ` Rubén Justo
2023-02-27 19:30 ` Jonathan Tan
2023-02-28 0:11 ` Rubén Justo
2023-02-22 22:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] branch: description for orphan branch errors Rubén Justo
2023-02-27 19:38 ` Jonathan Tan
2023-02-27 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-28 0:22 ` Rubén Justo
2023-02-22 22:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree Rubén Justo
2023-02-27 19:41 ` Jonathan Tan
2023-02-28 0:23 ` Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] branch: operations on orphan branches Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] branch: test for failures while renaming branches Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] branch: use get_worktrees() in copy_or_rename_branch() Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] branch: description for orphan branch errors Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree Rubén Justo
2023-03-26 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals Rubén Justo
2023-03-27 19:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] branch: operations on orphan branches Junio C Hamano
2023-05-01 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a050344-27ea-4f26-e66a-2795596eb11d@gmail.com \
--to=rjusto@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).