Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Nikolaus Schuetz via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolaus Schuetz <nikolauspschuetz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge-base: add tests for --is-ancestor
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:39:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a47d529-6195-435b-90a6-e511856f128e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2186.git.1784998828879.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

Hi Nikolaus

On 25/07/2026 18:00, Nikolaus Schuetz via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Nikolaus Schuetz <nikolauspschuetz@gmail.com>
> 
> `git merge-base --is-ancestor A B` is used a lot in scripts but has no
> tests. Add some to t6010 covering its exit codes: 0 when A is an
> ancestor of B, 1 when it is not, and 128 (not 1) when given a bad
> argument. Also check that --is-ancestor and --all can't be combined,
> and that the resulting error names both options.

Thanks for adding some tests for this option

> diff --git a/t/t6010-merge-base.sh b/t/t6010-merge-base.sh
> index 44c726ea39..d28d9dab2c 100755
> --- a/t/t6010-merge-base.sh
> +++ b/t/t6010-merge-base.sh
> @@ -305,4 +305,38 @@ test_expect_success 'merge-base --octopus --all for complex tree' '
>   	test_cmp expected actual
>   '
>   
> +test_expect_success 'setup --is-ancestor' '
> +	git init is-ancestor &&
> +	(
> +		cd is-ancestor &&
> +		test_commit one &&
> +		test_commit two &&
> +		git checkout -b side one &&
> +		test_commit three
> +	)
> +'

Do we really need to create a new repository? None of the existing tests 
do that - can't we just use the commits created by the first test? 
Having said that, the tests below look good. We could perhaps have a 
test to check that it fails with one commit or three commits but what 
you have here is clearly a very useful improvement in our test coverage.

Thanks

Phillip

> +test_expect_success '--is-ancestor parent and child' '
> +	git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor one two &&
> +	test_expect_code 1 git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor two one
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '--is-ancestor self' '
> +	git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor two two
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '--is-ancestor diverged commits' '
> +	test_expect_code 1 git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor three two
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '--is-ancestor exit 128 non-existent commit' '
> +	test_expect_code 128 git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor one no-such-commit &&
> +	test_expect_code 128 git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor no-such-commit one
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '--is-ancestor and --all cannot be used together' '
> +	test_expect_code 128 git -C is-ancestor merge-base --is-ancestor --all one two 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "options .--is-ancestor. and .--all. cannot be used together" err
> +'
> +
>   test_done
> 
> base-commit: f60db8d575adb79761d363e026fb49bddf330c73


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25 17:00 [PATCH] merge-base: add tests for --is-ancestor Nikolaus Schuetz via GitGitGadget
2026-07-28 22:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-29  9:39 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2026-07-29 15:31   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a47d529-6195-435b-90a6-e511856f128e@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=nikolauspschuetz@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox