From: Daniele Segato <daniele.bilug@gmail.com>
To: newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:44:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9accb4400909290144t1363b5c6t8886bfa01e486c94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h9nlhj$heq$1@ger.gmane.org>
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Anteru
<newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net> wrote:
> I'm currently evaluating DVCS for a project, and we're at a point where
> it comes down to either Mercurial or Git. Right now, I'm advocating for
> Git, while my co-workers like Mercurial, so I'd like to provide some
> good arguments in favor of git. Unfortunately, I'm not a git expert, so
> I hope I can get some help here ...
>
> First of all, what's the matter with git and Windows, is there some
> long-term commitment to make git work on Windows as well as on Linux?
> I'm using msysgit on Windows, and personally I'm happy with it, but my
> co-workers constantly nag that Mercurial has superior portability ...
Can I propose to make this discussion cross-mailing list adding the hg
mailing list to the CC?
I think it would be a good discussion if we don't end up flaming.
Let me know what you think about it
about the Windows+Git compatibility, you may consider TortoiseGit too
for the not-CLI-oriented guys; I've seen it a while ago and it seems
pettry well integrated with windows
> Mercurial's revision number system: With git, I get an SHA1 hash for
> every commit, but it's not possible to see whether Hash1 is newer than
> Hash2, while Mecurial also adds a running number to each commit. What's
> the rationale behind this decision for git, and is it possible to
> emulate Mercurial's behavior somehow?
If you tag a commit then you should be able to see how many commits
there are from that one issuing a git describe
(found on the internet)
git commit -m'Commit One.'
git tag -a -m'Tag One.' 1.2.3
git describe # => 1.2.3
git commit -m'Commit Two.'
git describe # => 1.2.3-1-gaac161d
git commit -m'Commit Three.'
git describe # => 1.2.3-2-g462715d
git tag -a -m'Tag Two.' 2.0.0
git describe # => 2.0.0
> So far, my key arguments are that git is more robust (more projects
> using it, larger developer base), of course git's excellent performance
> and the much better support for SVN, which is important for us as we can
> slowly migrate from SVN->Git, while hgmercurial is still in the making
> (and Python's SVN->Hg switch is for instance waiting for it).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-27 12:24 Deciding between Git/Mercurial Anteru
2009-09-27 18:01 ` Robin Rosenberg
2009-09-27 18:10 ` Anteru
2009-09-27 18:44 ` Alex Riesen
2009-09-27 18:51 ` Mark Struberg
2009-09-27 19:18 ` Anteru
2009-09-27 19:31 ` Alex Riesen
2009-09-27 19:34 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-09-27 18:55 ` Pascal Obry
2009-10-22 8:01 ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-28 8:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-28 8:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-28 10:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-09-28 11:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-28 11:17 ` Bruce Stephens
2009-09-30 11:14 ` Matthias Andree
2009-09-28 11:32 ` Dilip M
2009-09-28 20:54 ` Damien Wyart
2009-09-28 21:09 ` Steven Noonan
2009-09-28 21:33 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-28 23:56 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2009-09-29 0:01 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-29 7:44 ` Mike Ralphson
2009-09-29 8:21 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-29 8:22 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-28 23:11 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29 0:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29 6:32 ` Anteru
2009-09-29 18:44 ` Leo Razoumov
2009-09-29 18:58 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29 19:55 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-30 0:49 ` Leo Razoumov
2009-09-30 6:28 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-30 9:17 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-09-30 11:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29 1:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-09-29 8:44 ` Daniele Segato [this message]
2009-09-29 8:54 ` Dilip M
2009-09-30 11:09 ` Matthias Andree
2009-09-30 22:05 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-10-22 2:38 ` Dilip M
2009-10-22 6:50 ` Anteru
2009-10-22 7:12 ` Dilip M
2009-10-22 7:35 ` Anteru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9accb4400909290144t1363b5c6t8886bfa01e486c94@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniele.bilug@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).