git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniele Segato <daniele.bilug@gmail.com>
To: newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:44:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9accb4400909290144t1363b5c6t8886bfa01e486c94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h9nlhj$heq$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Anteru
<newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net> wrote:
> I'm currently evaluating DVCS for a project, and we're at a point where
> it comes down to either Mercurial or Git. Right now, I'm advocating for
> Git, while my co-workers like Mercurial, so I'd like to provide some
> good arguments in favor of git. Unfortunately, I'm not a git expert, so
> I hope I can get some help here ...
>
> First of all, what's the matter with git and Windows, is there some
> long-term commitment to make git work on Windows as well as on Linux?
> I'm using msysgit on Windows, and personally I'm happy with it, but my
> co-workers constantly nag that Mercurial has superior portability ...


Can I propose to make this discussion cross-mailing list adding the hg
mailing list to the CC?
I think it would be a good discussion if we don't end up flaming.
Let me know what you think about it


about the Windows+Git compatibility, you may consider TortoiseGit too
for the not-CLI-oriented guys; I've seen it a while ago and it seems
pettry well integrated with windows


> Mercurial's revision number system: With git, I get an SHA1 hash for
> every commit, but it's not possible to see whether Hash1 is newer than
> Hash2, while Mecurial also adds a running number to each commit. What's
> the rationale behind this decision for git, and is it possible to
> emulate Mercurial's behavior somehow?


If you tag a commit then you should be able to see how many commits
there are from that one issuing a git describe
(found on the internet)
git commit -m'Commit One.'
git tag -a -m'Tag One.' 1.2.3
git describe    # => 1.2.3
git commit -m'Commit Two.'
git describe    # => 1.2.3-1-gaac161d
git commit -m'Commit Three.'
git describe    # => 1.2.3-2-g462715d
git tag -a -m'Tag Two.' 2.0.0
git describe    # => 2.0.0


> So far, my key arguments are that git is more robust (more projects
> using it, larger developer base), of course git's excellent performance
> and the much better support for SVN, which is important for us as we can
> slowly migrate from SVN->Git, while hgmercurial is still in the making
> (and Python's SVN->Hg switch is for instance waiting for it).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-27 12:24 Deciding between Git/Mercurial Anteru
2009-09-27 18:01 ` Robin Rosenberg
2009-09-27 18:10   ` Anteru
2009-09-27 18:44     ` Alex Riesen
2009-09-27 18:51       ` Mark Struberg
2009-09-27 19:18         ` Anteru
2009-09-27 19:31           ` Alex Riesen
2009-09-27 19:34           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2009-09-27 18:55     ` Pascal Obry
2009-10-22  8:01   ` Martin Langhoff
2009-09-28  8:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-28  8:42   ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-28 10:08   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-09-28 11:01     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-28 11:17       ` Bruce Stephens
2009-09-30 11:14     ` Matthias Andree
2009-09-28 11:32 ` Dilip M
2009-09-28 20:54 ` Damien Wyart
2009-09-28 21:09   ` Steven Noonan
2009-09-28 21:33     ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-28 23:56       ` Randal L. Schwartz
2009-09-29  0:01         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-29  7:44         ` Mike Ralphson
2009-09-29  8:21       ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-29  8:22         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-28 23:11 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29  0:32   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29  6:32   ` Anteru
2009-09-29 18:44   ` Leo Razoumov
2009-09-29 18:58     ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29 19:55       ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-30  0:49       ` Leo Razoumov
2009-09-30  6:28         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-30  9:17         ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-09-30 11:09         ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-29  1:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-09-29  8:44 ` Daniele Segato [this message]
2009-09-29  8:54   ` Dilip M
2009-09-30 11:09 ` Matthias Andree
2009-09-30 22:05   ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-10-22  2:38 ` Dilip M
2009-10-22  6:50   ` Anteru
2009-10-22  7:12     ` Dilip M
2009-10-22  7:35       ` Anteru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9accb4400909290144t1363b5c6t8886bfa01e486c94@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=daniele.bilug@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).