From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert Anderson" Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:53:04 -0700 Message-ID: <9af502e50806280853i4c8564daxde2041aedc7fcb8d@mail.gmail.com> References: <9af502e50806262350t6e794a92g7751147f1882965@mail.gmail.com> <9af502e50806271014l661dcfc9o4f61ee2b54677bd6@mail.gmail.com> <20080628021444.GI5737@dpotapov.dyndns.org> <9af502e50806271957o2df9e0abt9dadcb0514dd4173@mail.gmail.com> <20080628040344.GK5737@dpotapov.dyndns.org> <9af502e50806272320p23f01e8eo4a67c5f6f4476098@mail.gmail.com> <20080628123522.GL5737@dpotapov.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Dmitry Potapov" , "Git Mailing List" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 28 17:55:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KCcld-0004sD-CC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:55:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752567AbYF1Pxu (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:53:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751823AbYF1Pxt (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:53:49 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:39398 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754479AbYF1PxH (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:53:07 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so457289fgg.17 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aIkTTawF+pqgDXE4OhC/BYdm8f0ayd5dQwK/kUqn0/c=; b=Qa1pPLduBP6CD7iajL4J01aylom/34VaawqAUJYIst9ZN709ERiBSA5KRG8ZjNJkMH aQp3wNaBJVbXmI25j3lXDQTVaUM3Xv2XWhFQJf2FPrR+ZfEpCBm/QYEIP79IZiqARduo qkZA+j8Lx/kkLht5m1LaxXSpOL4zgsuMb/17Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=evEoR7uDkDem/NqDIhJAHwwyCW4yaEz5mnO+dSUWeekmN4WDPL041rZ6//RJG+5lGH OntPR2nOzlWLYcw6XP51iiBy7GapNavWKHTku1GGAT3UW5DUw1EKNXts75EJ197Zn1A3 rkeyB2UmNLqm95Dp/hJdufnzFMk7rFp7/DWUY= Received: by 10.86.73.7 with SMTP id v7mr3696318fga.37.1214668384370; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.4.6 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080628123522.GL5737@dpotapov.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Dmitry Potapov wrote: >> Fine, you like doing extra work for no benefit. Enjoy yourself. > > I don't see where you find this extra work. You aren't trying to. You're knee-jerk defending the status quo, as is the case of 95% of reply mail sent to any SCM mailing list. I worked in this model for years. It is inconvenient and creates redundant work. It is a PITA. Thanks, Bob