From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert Anderson" Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:00:11 -0700 Message-ID: <9af502e50806280900m415eb354waee9edac91a70e8d@mail.gmail.com> References: <-8386235276716376372@unknownmsgid> <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com> <7viqvuo4hq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <9af502e50806271708p7979ae65k61b71be90efff2c4@mail.gmail.com> <9b3e2dc20806280734i6ca17cc8i447c2e2db67e8051@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Git Mailing List" To: "Stephen Sinclair" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 28 18:01:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KCcrp-0006zj-NF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:01:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751040AbYF1QAO (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:00:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751128AbYF1QAO (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:00:14 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:49148 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbYF1QAN (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:00:13 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so458115fgg.17 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kJXx0dXuDEtZWnKfDhX8TvNj3ob/LyrQQk4Gf/AS2Cc=; b=aJeaJb7XCxdmNyjveai88WsiwmrjbS7OEY9SYBvIuz3X8FQBqaBH8Fi6+htpphXcyL /ssSa55w854U1zsmmvWp9yBmhbMLdoolv/Ddpb9zosBRobQKIPez+yOa96NqhYwoIzJS yFlCuox2QfZ8Etbi63GLSa5TMFAeoaXn68wjs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fTpOHAwAD142RSvcCpqMp/QSKB688lj94HDCm9OqLRCoFKCBBcDCOlXn0BCGL6gOBc DtniZ0gIHVy8578T6AkrHA4pySupegTGHqp6f6fe3tJzktP0wGziVtGJFLf0shsFmHaJ ksXm3NX9SlLQKilMuGaCXDQuRqVamtgPoC32I= Received: by 10.86.33.10 with SMTP id g10mr1409827fgg.29.1214668811325; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.4.6 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9b3e2dc20806280734i6ca17cc8i447c2e2db67e8051@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > The answer is simple: you should not be making partial commits to a > repo that has been cloned. You should instead be working somewhere > else and then pushing to it. So this whole sentence is just a moot > point itself. Ah, now you've hit the crux. Thank you for the "svn style" response here. I "should not" because git has a deficiency. Absolutely no other reason. Thanks, Bob