From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen Sinclair" Subject: Re: Project Hosting with git ? Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:54:00 -0500 Message-ID: <9b3e2dc20801120954k24f7ccb6vf019f30843ff1b84@mail.gmail.com> References: <912ec82a0801120553u3621c991u7c4cb4793960159c@mail.gmail.com> <9b3e2dc20801120845n15d59fe6q178ba257c12a28e0@mail.gmail.com> <4788FBDE.6090903@gbarbier.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9goire_Barbier?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 12 18:54:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDkYy-0001Qu-FP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755427AbYALRyE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:54:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754219AbYALRyD (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:54:03 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.185]:42964 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753358AbYALRyA (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:54:00 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1279521rvb.1 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:54:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=X1kkU2bpik3EN+woWw4En1KOt5CkDzh6mIdCvBUHaF0=; b=I+GGGttAQnm2UbYadbFNGhQ19wja3mx+X6Z0HkTrVL71mAy9bTaDO+POEWizTCJ0KrSJOJkJ4KYKIdCrqGpTymBDpkpYgGuy1TTi+C6hJMrmxpWtRteuOfhWtCJ+DREE+rwOQ9ZAfoq+mMc1HCzXpoN6ZBCEdPktDTPKjBygO8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=izCrO3whTr4aRjxtcJbX/lIkKV/5xiTtC/l4ccIRd13OF/UCL0VhT3d4bv+DJiXCX9YRCqB+Kl/JPLbLRoFS7+F1I9oQ8utwMMsByqoNtryXoyUKDn52zijjBGOkIg2KZGNKFEPUq/tyidNkxxaINr93m05yPMj9txH3A7qyZTY= Received: by 10.141.51.15 with SMTP id d15mr2799824rvk.118.1200160440084; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.188.1 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:54:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4788FBDE.6090903@gbarbier.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I disagree: git does not work "fine" over http, it only works fine for > fetch/pull. You're taking me out of context. I meant it works fine for public hosting so that users can easily clone and create patches. This is the main motivation for publishing your repo, so in that sense it "works fine". (for me) Since SF supports ssh, there's no reason to need http-push. I wish they would just provide some recent git binaries on the sourceforge server, then we could git-push properly over ssh instead of using to use scp or rsync. I think that would be a good start. *shrug* In any case, http-push over webdav would still require git binaries to be installed somewhere on SF, so it's essentially the same problem. Steve