From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, "Øystein Walle" <oystwa@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rebase: write script before initializing state
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:22:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dc4331e-7c0d-4cc5-980e-a151853725b6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqple6zaga.fsf@gitster.g>
On 11/07/2025 22:25, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> If rebase.instructionFormat is invalid the repository is left in a
>> strange state when the interactive rebase fails. `git status` outputs
>> both the same as it would have in the normal case *and* something
>> related to the interactive rebase:
>>
>> $ git -c rebase.instructionFormat=blah rebase -i
>> fatal: invalid --pretty format: blah
>> $ git status
>> On branch master
>> Your branch is ahead of 'upstream/master' by 1 commit.
>> (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
>>
>> git-rebase-todo is missing.
>> No commands done.
>> No commands remaining.
>> You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch 'master' on '8db3019401'.
>> (use "git commit --amend" to amend the current commit)
>> (use "git rebase --continue" once you are satisfied with your changes)
>>
>> get_commit_format() calls die() on failure so we cannot handle the error
>> gracefully. By attempting to write the rebase script before initializing
>> the state this bad state can be avoided.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> So sorry for the delay. I saw that the signoff was missing, then saw
>> Phillip's review, decided to think about it and then life happened in
>> the mean time...
>
> No need to be sorry. Life happens, indeed.
>
>> This patch is identical to the first one except it has the missing
>> signoff and a few typos in the commit message corrected. Phillip's
>> suggestions are noted and appreciated but unfortunately I am unable to
>> work on the at the moment. And I do think my patch is at least an
>> improvement albeit perhaps less thorough than it could have been.
>
> Well, as long as we are making a step in the right direction, such a
> partial improvement gives us a better foundation for somebody else
> to further build on.
I don't think this is a better (or worse) foundation for future
improvement as solving this when the user passes '--autostash' needs a
different approach. When that option is given we create the state
directory earlier so moving when we call init_basic_state() has no effect.
> It does not look like that this patch would
> make it harder to later give us a more thorough solution.
I agree with this. I don't think this change makes fixing the
'--autostash' case harder, but fixing that case makes this change
redundant.
> Thanks for working on the topic.
Yes, thank you Øystein
Phillip
>> builtin/rebase.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh | 10 +++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
>> index 2e8c4ee678..8139816417 100644
>> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
>> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
>> @@ -293,15 +293,6 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct rebase_options *opts, unsigned flags)
>> &revisions, &shortrevisions))
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> - if (init_basic_state(&replay,
>> - opts->head_name ? opts->head_name : "detached HEAD",
>> - opts->onto, &opts->orig_head->object.oid))
>> - goto cleanup;
>> -
>> - if (!opts->upstream && opts->squash_onto)
>> - write_file(path_squash_onto(), "%s\n",
>> - oid_to_hex(opts->squash_onto));
>> -
>> strvec_pushl(&make_script_args, "", revisions, NULL);
>> if (opts->restrict_revision)
>> strvec_pushf(&make_script_args, "^%s",
>> @@ -310,21 +301,30 @@ static int do_interactive_rebase(struct rebase_options *opts, unsigned flags)
>> ret = sequencer_make_script(the_repository, &todo_list.buf,
>> make_script_args.nr, make_script_args.v,
>> flags);
>> -
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> error(_("could not generate todo list"));
>> - else {
>> - discard_index(the_repository->index);
>> - if (todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(the_repository, &replay,
>> - todo_list.buf.buf, &todo_list))
>> - BUG("unusable todo list");
>> -
>> - ret = complete_action(the_repository, &replay, flags,
>> - shortrevisions, opts->onto_name, opts->onto,
>> - &opts->orig_head->object.oid, &opts->exec,
>> - opts->autosquash, opts->update_refs, &todo_list);
>> + goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> + if (init_basic_state(&replay,
>> + opts->head_name ? opts->head_name : "detached HEAD",
>> + opts->onto, &opts->orig_head->object.oid))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> + if (!opts->upstream && opts->squash_onto)
>> + write_file(path_squash_onto(), "%s\n",
>> + oid_to_hex(opts->squash_onto));
>> +
>> + discard_index(the_repository->index);
>> + if (todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(the_repository, &replay,
>> + todo_list.buf.buf, &todo_list))
>> + BUG("unusable todo list");
>> +
>> + ret = complete_action(the_repository, &replay, flags,
>> + shortrevisions, opts->onto_name, opts->onto,
>> + &opts->orig_head->object.oid, &opts->exec,
>> + opts->autosquash, opts->update_refs, &todo_list);
>> +
>> cleanup:
>> replay_opts_release(&replay);
>> free(revisions);
>> diff --git a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
>> index 26b42a526a..5d093e3a7a 100755
>> --- a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh
>> @@ -394,6 +394,16 @@ test_expect_success 'autosquash with empty custom instructionFormat' '
>> )
>> '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'autosquash with invalid custom instructionFormat' '
>> + git reset --hard base &&
>> + test_commit invalid-instructionFormat-test &&
>> + (
>> + test_must_fail git -c rebase.instructionFormat=blah \
>> + rebase --autosquash --force-rebase -i HEAD^ &&
>> + test_path_is_missing .git/rebase-merge
>> + )
>> +'
>> +
>> set_backup_editor () {
>> write_script backup-editor.sh <<-\EOF
>> cp "$1" .git/backup-"$(basename "$1")"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 22:10 [PATCH] rebase: write script before initializing state Øystein Walle
2025-06-09 23:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-10 10:13 ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-09 0:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 20:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Øystein Walle
2025-07-11 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-24 14:22 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2025-07-23 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dc4331e-7c0d-4cc5-980e-a151853725b6@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=oystwa@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).