* cogito and tags propagation
@ 2005-06-12 15:50 Jon Smirl
2005-06-12 17:49 ` Zack Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2005-06-12 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
If I add a tag to tree A, then go to tree B which depends on A and do
cg update. It says the branch is already fully merged. It's not
counting the addition of a tag as something that marks the tree dirty.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: cogito and tags propagation
2005-06-12 15:50 cogito and tags propagation Jon Smirl
@ 2005-06-12 17:49 ` Zack Brown
2005-06-12 17:54 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zack Brown @ 2005-06-12 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Smirl; +Cc: git
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:50:08AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> If I add a tag to tree A, then go to tree B which depends on A and do
> cg update. It says the branch is already fully merged. It's not
> counting the addition of a tag as something that marks the tree dirty.
My impression is that tags are local to a given repo, i.e. they are not included
by default in the publically accessible data. The repo owner has to somehow
'tell' people about the tags, in order for them to be able to get them.
Apparently this is useful because it allows smaller groups to work together with
their own 'local' tags, without polluting the main tree.
Be well,
Zack
>
> --
> Jon Smirl
> jonsmirl@gmail.com
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Zack Brown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: cogito and tags propagation
2005-06-12 17:49 ` Zack Brown
@ 2005-06-12 17:54 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2005-06-12 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zack Brown; +Cc: git
On 6/12/05, Zack Brown <zbrown@tumblerings.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:50:08AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > If I add a tag to tree A, then go to tree B which depends on A and do
> > cg update. It says the branch is already fully merged. It's not
> > counting the addition of a tag as something that marks the tree dirty.
>
> My impression is that tags are local to a given repo, i.e. they are not included
> by default in the publically accessible data. The repo owner has to somehow
> 'tell' people about the tags, in order for them to be able to get them.
I have a bunch of tags in my repo that have been cloned from linus. So
the tags do move through the system. But it seems that they need a
commit to make them move, apparently creating a new tag doesn't count
as a commit (and make a new tree head id).
[jonsmirl@jonsmirl .git]$ ls refs/tags
v2.6.11 v2.6.11-tree v2.6.12-rc2 v2.6.12-rc3 v2.6.12-rc4
v2.6.12-rc5 v2.6.12-rc6
>
> Apparently this is useful because it allows smaller groups to work together with
> their own 'local' tags, without polluting the main tree.
>
> Be well,
> Zack
>
> >
> > --
> > Jon Smirl
> > jonsmirl@gmail.com
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Zack Brown
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-12 17:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-12 15:50 cogito and tags propagation Jon Smirl
2005-06-12 17:49 ` Zack Brown
2005-06-12 17:54 ` Jon Smirl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).