From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: cogito and tags propagation Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:54:44 -0400 Message-ID: <9e473391050612105461005e3f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e4733910506120850f762078@mail.gmail.com> <20050612174905.GA18751@tumblerings.org> Reply-To: Jon Smirl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 12 19:50:31 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhWbG-0005OH-2y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:50:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262663AbVFLRyx (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:54:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262664AbVFLRyx (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:54:53 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:4412 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262663AbVFLRyo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:54:44 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so965794wri for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:54:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=INEQ35FLaK5EspQLDxNgQ7y/fGIqMKaX6UJn7vD7oKt81dF5Mn4pyftqbv43GaXOQASdWOpUgSdq3x3wFailtDY6UnifaXNTPlTUl9QPqd1a8Thkl9cf3k+2+z/U4vEIkan8Mv4MDjeDsYAKDog3pgLf/niOJLkYdKR+wMoaawA= Received: by 10.54.133.3 with SMTP id g3mr2310386wrd; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.94.8 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:54:44 -0700 (PDT) To: Zack Brown In-Reply-To: <20050612174905.GA18751@tumblerings.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 6/12/05, Zack Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:50:08AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > If I add a tag to tree A, then go to tree B which depends on A and do > > cg update. It says the branch is already fully merged. It's not > > counting the addition of a tag as something that marks the tree dirty. > > My impression is that tags are local to a given repo, i.e. they are not included > by default in the publically accessible data. The repo owner has to somehow > 'tell' people about the tags, in order for them to be able to get them. I have a bunch of tags in my repo that have been cloned from linus. So the tags do move through the system. But it seems that they need a commit to make them move, apparently creating a new tag doesn't count as a commit (and make a new tree head id). [jonsmirl@jonsmirl .git]$ ls refs/tags v2.6.11 v2.6.11-tree v2.6.12-rc2 v2.6.12-rc3 v2.6.12-rc4 v2.6.12-rc5 v2.6.12-rc6 > > Apparently this is useful because it allows smaller groups to work together with > their own 'local' tags, without polluting the main tree. > > Be well, > Zack > > > > > -- > > Jon Smirl > > jonsmirl@gmail.com > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > Zack Brown > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com