Re: oprofile on svn import

["Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>]

On 6/13/06, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm going back to cvsimport tomorrow. My svn import that had been
> > running for five days got killed this morning when the city decided to
> > move the telephone pole that provides my electricty.
> >
> > Some oprofile data, this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Why is it
> > in libcypto so much?
>
> The sha1 calculation is done in libcrypto, afaik.

That make sense, but it's eating up 14% of my CPU in a long sample.

> Anybody want to see how my latest patches to git-svn (and using SVN perl
> libraries) stacks up against the mozilla repo?  Speedwise, I don't
> expect git-svn to be too different than git-svnimport, but it should use
> much less memory (I'll probably port the hacks to git-svnimport, too).

Can svnimport be rewritten to avoid calling fork? If I am reading the
oprofiles correctly that fork is very expensive especially when the
svnimport task grows to 600MB.

I have an import running but post your code when it is ready and I can
try it on the next run. They always seem to fail so there will
probably be another run.

> I'll see about freeing up one of my machines to test the mozilla repo.
> Unfortunately, all of my hardware is a few years old and not extremely
> fast.
>
> --
> Eric Wong
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com